Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, 02215 Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Boston University School of Medicine, 72 East Concord Street, 02118 Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Joint Bone Spine. 2018 Jul;85(4):469-473. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2017.09.001. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
Septic polyarthritis is rarer than septic monoarthritis, but associated with higher mortality. Septic polyarthritis may be difficult to distinguish clinically from noninfectious inflammatory arthritis. We describe one of the largest samples of septic polyarthritis with the aim of distinguishing septic monoarthritis from polyarthritis.
We conducted a retrospective study of adults admitted to tertiary care with septic monoarthritis and polyarthritis. Baseline characteristics, microbial profiles, joint involvement, length of stay, and 60-day readmission rates were determined.
We identified 464 and 42 cases of septic monoarthritis and polyarthritis, respectively, including 7 cases of septic polyarthritis with comorbid rheumatoid arthritis. Compared to those with septic monoarthritis, patients with septic polyarthritis were more likely to have rheumatoid arthritis (P<0.01), sepsis (P<0.01), and higher peripheral (P<0.001) and synovial (P<0.001) white blood cell counts. Operative intervention rates were similar, but mean length of stay was longer in polyarticular septic arthritis (P<0.001). Patients with septic polyarthritis with/without underlying rheumatoid arthritis were similar in terms of presenting features and outcomes, except for more frequent immunosuppressive therapy in rheumatoid arthritis (P<0.01).
In this sample of patients with septic arthritis, patients with septic polyarthritis were more likely to have systemic infection at presentation than those with septic monoarthritis. Despite this difference, patients with septic monoarthritis and polyarthritis tended to have similar outcomes. While rheumatoid arthritis was observed more frequently among patients with septic polyarthritis, those with/without underlying rheumatoid arthritis had similar presenting features and outcomes.
脓毒性多关节炎比脓毒性单关节炎少见,但死亡率更高。脓毒性多关节炎在临床上可能难以与非感染性炎症性关节炎区分。我们描述了最大的一组脓毒性多关节炎样本,旨在区分脓毒性单关节炎和多关节炎。
我们对在三级护理机构因脓毒性单关节炎和多关节炎入院的成年人进行了回顾性研究。确定了基线特征、微生物特征、关节受累、住院时间和 60 天再入院率。
我们分别确定了 464 例和 42 例脓毒性单关节炎和多关节炎病例,包括 7 例合并类风湿关节炎的脓毒性多关节炎病例。与脓毒性单关节炎患者相比,脓毒性多关节炎患者更有可能患有类风湿关节炎(P<0.01)、脓毒症(P<0.01)以及外周血(P<0.001)和滑膜(P<0.001)白细胞计数更高。手术干预率相似,但多关节炎性脓毒性关节炎的平均住院时间更长(P<0.001)。有/无潜在类风湿关节炎的脓毒性多关节炎患者在表现特征和结局方面相似,除了类风湿关节炎患者更频繁地使用免疫抑制治疗(P<0.01)。
在本样本的脓毒性关节炎患者中,与脓毒性单关节炎患者相比,脓毒性多关节炎患者在就诊时更有可能出现全身感染。尽管存在这种差异,但脓毒性单关节炎和多关节炎患者的结局往往相似。虽然在脓毒性多关节炎患者中更常观察到类风湿关节炎,但有/无潜在类风湿关节炎的患者在表现特征和结局方面相似。