1 University of Montana, Missoula, USA.
2 University of California, Berkeley, USA.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2017 Oct;43(10):1378-1398. doi: 10.1177/0146167217713192. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
What kinds of physical environments make for free societies? The present research investigates the effect of three different types of ecological stressors (climate stress, pathogen stress, and frontier topography) on two measurements of governmental restriction: Vertical restriction involves select persons imposing asymmetrical laws on others, while horizontal restriction involves laws that restrict most members of a society equally. Investigation 1 validates our measurements of vertical and horizontal restriction. Investigation 2 demonstrates that, across both U.S. states and a sample of nations, ecological stressors tend to cause more vertically restrictive societies but less horizontally restrictive societies. Investigation 3 demonstrates that assortative sociality partially mediates ecological stress→restriction relationships across nations, but not in U.S. states. Although some stressor-specific effects emerged (most notably, cold stress consistently showed effects in the opposite direction), these results in the main suggest that ecological stress simultaneously creates opposing pressures that push freedom in two different directions.
什么样的物理环境造就了自由社会?本研究调查了三种不同类型的生态压力源(气候压力、病原体压力和前沿地形)对两种政府限制措施的影响:垂直限制涉及到选择一些人对其他人实施不对称的法律,而水平限制则涉及到限制社会中大多数成员的法律。研究 1 验证了我们对垂直和水平限制的测量。研究 2 表明,在美国各州和一个国家样本中,生态压力源往往导致更垂直限制的社会,但水平限制的社会较少。研究 3 表明,在国家之间,社会同质性的选择性部分中介了生态压力与限制之间的关系,但在美国各州则没有。尽管出现了一些特定压力源的影响(最显著的是,寒冷压力始终表现出相反方向的影响),但这些结果主要表明,生态压力同时产生了相反的压力,将自由推向两个不同的方向。