1The National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care West (NIHR CLAHRC West),University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust,Bristol,UK.
2School of Social and Community Medicine,NIHR CLAHRC West,Level 9,Whitefriars,Lewins Mead,University of Bristol,Bristol BS1 2NT,UK.
Public Health Nutr. 2018 Apr;21(5):831-837. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017002324. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
There is evidence to suggest that individual components of dietary intake are associated with depressive symptoms. Studying the whole diet, through dietary patterns, has become popular as a way of overcoming intercorrelations between individual dietary components; however, there are conflicting results regarding associations between dietary patterns and depressive symptoms. We examined the associations between dietary patterns extracted using principal component analysis and depressive symptoms, taking account of potential temporal relationships.
Depressive symptoms in parents were assessed using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) when the study child was 3 and 5 years of age. Scores >12 were considered indicative of the presence of clinical depressive symptoms. Diet was assessed via FFQ when the study child was 4 years of age.
Longitudinal population-based birth cohort.
Mothers and fathers taking part in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children when their study child was 3-5 years old.
Unadjusted results suggested that increased scores on the 'processed' and 'vegetarian' patterns in women and the 'semi-vegetarian' pattern in men were associated with having EPDS scores ≥13. However, after adjustment for confounders all results were attenuated. This was the case for all those with available data and when considering a sub-sample who were 'disease free' at baseline.
We found no association between dietary patterns and depressive symptoms after taking account of potential confounding factors and the potential temporal relationship between them. This suggests that previous studies reporting positive associations may have suffered from reverse causality and/or residual confounding.
有证据表明,饮食摄入的各个组成部分与抑郁症状有关。通过饮食模式研究整个饮食,已成为克服饮食成分之间相互关联的一种流行方法;然而,关于饮食模式与抑郁症状之间的关联,结果存在矛盾。我们通过主成分分析提取饮食模式,并考虑潜在的时间关系,研究了其与抑郁症状之间的关联。
当研究儿童 3 岁和 5 岁时,使用爱丁堡产后抑郁量表(EPDS)评估父母的抑郁症状。得分>12 被认为存在临床抑郁症状。在研究儿童 4 岁时通过 FFQ 评估饮食。
纵向基于人群的出生队列。
当他们的研究孩子 3-5 岁时,参与阿冯纵向研究父母和孩子的母亲和父亲。
未调整的结果表明,女性的“加工”和“素食”模式得分增加,男性的“半素食”模式得分增加与 EPDS 得分≥13 相关。然而,在调整混杂因素后,所有结果都减弱了。对于所有具有可用数据的人以及在考虑基线时“无病”的子样本时,都是如此。
在考虑潜在混杂因素和它们之间的潜在时间关系后,我们没有发现饮食模式与抑郁症状之间的关联。这表明以前报告阳性关联的研究可能受到反向因果关系和/或残余混杂的影响。