Tanaka Makoto, Watanabe Seiji, Naito Hiroshi
Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1 Tennoudai, 305, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Mito Saiseikai General Hospital, 3-3-10 Futabadai, 311-41, Mito, Ibaraki, Japan.
J Anesth. 1994 Jun;8(2):150-153. doi: 10.1007/BF02514703.
We conducted a retrospective study to determine whether bupivacaine or fentanyl is a better adjuvant to epidural morphine for postoperative analgesia using 108 patients. Following epidural lidocaine anesthesia with or without light general anesthesia for major gynecological surgeries, 59 patients received epidural morphine (EPM) 2 mg (group M), 21 patients received morphine 2 mg plus 0.25% plain bupivacaine 6-10 ml epidurally (group B), and 28 patients received morphine 2 mg plus fentanyl 100 μg epidurally (group F). The analgesic interval, defined as the duration from EPM injection to the first request of analgesics for incisional pain, was significantly longer in group F than in group M (29±11vs 19±17 h,P<0.05), but similar to group B (22±14 h). Group F patients required the least amount of analgesics for incisional pain of the three groups during the first 24 h postoperatively (P<0.01). The incidence of adverse effects was similar among all three groups. In conclusion, fentanyl appears to be a better adjuvant to epidural morphine than bupivacaine.
我们进行了一项回顾性研究,以确定布比卡因或芬太尼作为硬膜外吗啡术后镇痛辅助用药哪种效果更好,研究共纳入108例患者。在接受有或无轻度全身麻醉的硬膜外利多卡因麻醉后进行大型妇科手术,59例患者接受硬膜外注射吗啡2 mg(M组),21例患者接受硬膜外注射吗啡2 mg加0.25%普通布比卡因6 - 10 ml(B组),28例患者接受硬膜外注射吗啡2 mg加芬太尼100 μg(F组)。镇痛间隔定义为从硬膜外注射吗啡至首次因切口疼痛要求使用镇痛药的时长,F组显著长于M组(29±11对19±17小时,P<0.05),但与B组相似(22±14小时)。F组患者在术后24小时内切口疼痛所需镇痛药用量在三组中最少(P<0.01)。三组不良反应发生率相似。总之,芬太尼作为硬膜外吗啡的辅助用药似乎比布比卡因效果更好。