Department of Psychology, University of Maryland.
Department of Educational Psychology, Counseling, and Special Education, Pennsylvania State University.
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2017 Sep;54(3):307-319. doi: 10.1037/pst0000126.
Countertransference is an important aspect of the therapeutic relationship that exists in therapies of all theoretical orientations, and depending on how it is managed, it can either help or hinder treatment. Management of countertransference has been measured almost exclusively with the Countertransference Factors Inventory (Van Wagoner, Gelso, Hayes, & Diemer, 1991) and its variations, all of which focus on 5 therapist qualities theorized to facilitate management: self-insight, conceptualizing ability, empathy, self-integration, and anxiety management. Existing versions of the Countertransference Factors Inventory, however, possess certain psychometric limitations that appear to constrain how well they assess actual management of countertransference during a therapy session. We thus sought to develop a new measure that addressed these limitations and that captured the 5 therapist qualities as constituents (rather than correlates) of countertransference management that manifest in the treatment hour. The development and initial validation of the resulting 22-item Countertransference Management Scale (CMS) is described here. Exploratory factor analysis of ratings of 286 therapy supervisors of current supervisees indicated that the 5 constituents of countertransference management could be grouped into 2 correlated factors: "Understanding Self and Client" and "Self-Integration and Regulation." Evidence of convergent and criterion-related validity was supported by CMS total and subscale scores correlating as expected with measures of theoretically relevant constructs, namely, therapist countertransference behavior, theoretical framework, self-esteem, observing ego, empathic understanding, and tolerance of anxiety. Results also supported the internal consistency of the CMS and its subscales. Research, clinical, and training implications are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record
反移情是治疗关系中的一个重要方面,存在于所有理论取向的治疗中,并且取决于如何管理,它可以帮助或阻碍治疗。反移情的管理几乎完全是通过反移情因素量表(Van Wagoner、Gelso、Hayes 和 Diemer,1991)及其变体来衡量的,这些量表都集中在 5 种被认为有助于管理的治疗师素质上:自我洞察、概念化能力、同理心、自我整合和焦虑管理。然而,现有的反移情因素量表存在一定的心理测量限制,似乎限制了它们在治疗过程中评估反移情实际管理的能力。因此,我们试图开发一种新的量表来解决这些限制,并将这 5 种治疗师素质作为构成(而不是相关)反移情管理的组成部分,这些素质在治疗过程中表现出来。这里描述了由此产生的 22 项反移情管理量表(CMS)的开发和初步验证。对 286 名当前督导的治疗督导者的评分进行的探索性因素分析表明,反移情管理的 5 个构成部分可以分为 2 个相关因素:“理解自我和客户”和“自我整合和调节”。CMS 总分和分量表与理论相关结构的测量值的预期相关表明了其会聚和效标关联效度,即治疗师的反移情行为、理论框架、自尊、观察自我、同理心理解和焦虑容忍度。结果还支持了 CMS 及其分量表的内部一致性。讨论了研究、临床和培训的意义。