Brederoo Sanne G, Nieuwenstein Mark R, Lorist Monicque M, Cornelissen Frans W
Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, The Netherlands; Neuroimaging Center Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands; Research School Behavioural and Cognitive Neurosciences, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, The Netherlands; Research School Behavioural and Cognitive Neurosciences, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
Brain Cogn. 2017 Dec;119:10-16. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2017.09.005. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
It is often assumed that the human brain processes the global and local properties of visual stimuli in a lateralized fashion, with a left hemisphere (LH) specialization for local detail, and a right hemisphere (RH) specialization for global form. However, the evidence for such global-local lateralization stems predominantly from studies using linguistic stimuli, the processing of which has shown to be LH lateralized in itself. In addition, some studies have reported a reversal of global-local lateralization when using non-linguistic stimuli. Accordingly, it remains unclear whether global-local lateralization may in fact be stimulus-specific. To address this issue, we asked participants to respond to linguistic and non-linguistic stimuli that were presented in the right and left visual fields, allowing for first access by the LH and RH, respectively. The results showed global-RH and local-LH advantages for both stimulus types, but the global lateralization effect was larger for linguistic stimuli. Furthermore, this pattern of results was found to be robust, as it was observed regardless of two other task manipulations. We conclude that the instantiation and direction of global and local lateralization is not stimulus-specific. However, the magnitude of global,-but not local-, lateralization is dependent on stimulus type.
人们常常认为,人类大脑以一种偏侧化的方式处理视觉刺激的全局和局部属性,左半球(LH)专门处理局部细节,右半球(RH)专门处理全局形式。然而,这种全局-局部偏侧化的证据主要来自使用语言刺激的研究,而语言刺激的处理本身已显示出是左半球偏侧化的。此外,一些研究报告称,在使用非语言刺激时,全局-局部偏侧化会发生逆转。因此,全局-局部偏侧化是否实际上可能是刺激特异性的仍不清楚。为了解决这个问题,我们要求参与者对分别呈现于右视野和左视野的语言和非语言刺激做出反应,从而分别让左半球和右半球首先接触这些刺激。结果显示,两种刺激类型均存在全局-右半球和局部-左半球优势,但语言刺激的全局偏侧化效应更大。此外,发现这种结果模式是稳健的,因为无论其他两种任务操作如何,都能观察到这一模式。我们得出结论,全局和局部偏侧化的实例化和方向并非刺激特异性的。然而,全局(而非局部)偏侧化的程度取决于刺激类型。