Amara Amy W, Walker Harrison C, Joop Allen, Cutter Gary, DeWolfe Jennifer L, Harding Susan M, Standaert David G
1Division of Movement Disorders, Department of Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2017 Mar-Apr;4(2):183-190. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.12375. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
Sleep dysfunction is a common and disabling non-motor symptom in Parkinson's disease. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) improves motor symptoms and subjective sleep in PD, but alternative stimulation parameters to optimize sleep have not been explored. We hypothesized that low frequency STN DBS would improve objective sleep more than conventional settings.
Twenty PD subjects with STN DBS (18 unilateral, 2 bilateral) underwent 3 non-consecutive nights of polysomnography: DBS off; DBS high frequency (≥130 Hz); and DBS low frequency (60 Hz). Motor symptom tolerability was assessed 30 minutes after resumption of baseline settings the morning following polysomnography. The primary outcome was change in sleep efficiency between high and low frequency nights measured with repeated measures ANOVA.
There was no difference in sleep efficiency between nights at high frequency (82.1% (72.6-90.1)) (median (IQR)), low frequency (81.2% (56.2-88.8)), or DBS off (82.8% (75.7-87.4)), p=0.241. Additionally, there was no difference in sleep stage percent, arousals, limb movements, subjective sleep quality, or objective vigilance measures. These outcomes did not change after adjusting for age, sex, disease duration, or side of surgery. No residual adverse motor effects were noted.
Although well tolerated, low frequency STN DBS did not improve objective sleep in PD. Remarkably, objective measures of sleep were not worse with DBS off. These observations point to the potential for adaptive stimulation approaches, through which DBS settings could be optimized during sleep to meet individual needs. Additionally, these changes could preserve battery life without compromising patient outcomes.
睡眠功能障碍是帕金森病常见且致残的非运动症状。丘脑底核(STN)的深部脑刺激(DBS)可改善帕金森病的运动症状和主观睡眠,但尚未探索优化睡眠的替代刺激参数。我们假设低频STN-DBS比传统设置能更好地改善客观睡眠。
20例接受STN-DBS治疗的帕金森病患者(18例单侧,2例双侧)进行了3个非连续夜晚的多导睡眠图检查:DBS关闭;DBS高频(≥130Hz);以及DBS低频(60Hz)。在多导睡眠图检查后的早晨恢复基线设置30分钟后评估运动症状耐受性。主要结局是通过重复测量方差分析测量的高频和低频夜晚之间睡眠效率的变化。
高频(82.1%(72.6-90.1))(中位数(四分位间距))、低频(81.2%(56.2-88.8))或DBS关闭(82.8%(75.7-87.4))夜晚的睡眠效率无差异,p=0.241。此外,睡眠阶段百分比、觉醒、肢体运动、主观睡眠质量或客观警觉性测量也无差异。在调整年龄、性别、病程或手术侧后,这些结局没有变化。未观察到残留的不良运动效应。
尽管耐受性良好,但低频STN-DBS并未改善帕金森病患者的客观睡眠。值得注意的是,DBS关闭时睡眠的客观测量结果并不更差。这些观察结果表明了适应性刺激方法的潜力,通过这种方法可以在睡眠期间优化DBS设置以满足个体需求。此外,这些改变可以在不影响患者预后的情况下延长电池寿命。