Bruijnzeel Hanneke, Bezdjian Aren, Lesinski-Schiedat Anke, Illg Angelika, Tzifa Konstance, Monteiro Luisa, Volpe Antonio Della, Grolman Wilko, Topsakal Vedat
a Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery , University Medical Center Utrecht , The Netherlands.
b Brain Center Rudolf Magnus , University of Utrecht , Utrecht , The Netherlands.
Cochlear Implants Int. 2017 Nov;18(6):287-296. doi: 10.1080/14670100.2017.1375238. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
International guidelines indicate that children with profound hearing loss should receive a cochlear implant (CI) soon after diagnosis in order to optimize speech and language rehabilitation. Although prompt rehabilitation is encouraged by current guidelines, delays in cochlear implantation are still present. This study investigated whether European countries establish timely pediatric CI care based on epidemiological, commercial, and clinical data.
An estimation of the number of pediatric CI candidates in European countries was performed and compared to epidemiological (Euro-CIU), commercial (Cochlear), and clinical (institutional) age-at-implantation data. The ages at implantation of pediatric patients in eight countries (the Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, the United Kingdom, France, Turkey, Portugal, and Italy) between 2005 and 2015 were evaluated.
From 2010 onwards, over 30% of the pediatric CI candidates were implanted before 24 months of age. Northern European institutions implanted children on average around 12 months of age, whereas southern European institutions implanted children after 18 months of age. The Netherlands and Germany implanted earliest (between 6 and 11 months).
Implemented newborn hearing screening programs and reimbursement rates of CIs vary greatly within Europe due to local, social, financial, and political differences. However, internationally accepted recommendations are applicable to this heterogeneous European CI practice. Although consensus on early pediatric cochlear implantation exists, this study identified marked delays in European care.
Regardless of the great heterogeneity in European practice, reasons for latency should be identified on a national level and possibilities to prevent avoidable future implantation delays should be explored to provide national recommendations.
国际指南指出,重度听力损失儿童应在确诊后尽快接受人工耳蜗植入(CI),以优化言语和语言康复。尽管当前指南鼓励及时进行康复治疗,但人工耳蜗植入仍存在延迟情况。本研究调查了欧洲国家是否根据流行病学、商业和临床数据建立及时的儿科人工耳蜗植入护理。
对欧洲国家儿科人工耳蜗植入候选者的数量进行了估计,并与流行病学(欧洲人工耳蜗植入登记处)、商业(科利耳公司)和临床(机构)植入年龄数据进行了比较。评估了2005年至2015年期间八个国家(荷兰、比利时、德国、英国、法国、土耳其、葡萄牙和意大利)儿科患者的植入年龄。
从2010年起,超过30%的儿科人工耳蜗植入候选者在24个月龄前接受了植入。北欧机构平均在12个月龄左右为儿童植入,而南欧机构在18个月龄后为儿童植入。荷兰和德国植入最早(在6至11个月之间)。
由于当地、社会、财政和政治差异,欧洲实施的新生儿听力筛查项目和人工耳蜗植入的报销率差异很大。然而,国际公认的建议适用于这种异质性的欧洲人工耳蜗植入实践。尽管在儿科早期人工耳蜗植入方面存在共识,但本研究发现欧洲的护理存在明显延迟。
尽管欧洲的实践存在很大异质性,但应在国家层面确定延迟的原因,并探索预防未来可避免的植入延迟的可能性,以提供国家建议。