Schemitsch Emil H
Department of Surgery, Western University, London Health Sciences Centre, University Hospital, London, ON, Canada.
J Orthop Trauma. 2017 Oct;31 Suppl 5:S20-S22. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000978.
Bone defects are common and are associated with a significant burden of disease. The treatment of these injuries remains controversial, particularly those defects which are critical sized. Despite the need for decision making to be evidence based, a lack of consensus around definitions of critical-sized defects still exists, particularly around those defects in the 1-3 cm range. There is a need to define "critical" in bone defect size because noncritical defects may heal without planned reconstruction and secondary surgery. This article reviews the current evidence around the definition of a critical-sized bone defect and concludes that defects in the order of 2.5 cm or greater seem to have a poor natural history.
骨缺损很常见,且与重大疾病负担相关。这些损伤的治疗仍存在争议,尤其是那些临界尺寸的缺损。尽管决策需要基于证据,但对于临界尺寸缺损的定义仍缺乏共识,特别是在1 - 3厘米范围内的缺损。有必要定义骨缺损大小中的“临界”,因为非临界缺损可能无需计划性重建和二次手术即可愈合。本文综述了关于临界尺寸骨缺损定义的当前证据,并得出结论,2.5厘米及以上的缺损自然转归似乎较差。