Suppr超能文献

有机酸作为抗生素替代物对肉鸡生产性能影响的荟萃分析研究。

Meta-analytic study of organic acids as an alternative performance-enhancing feed additive to antibiotics for broiler chickens.

机构信息

São Paulo State University (UNESP), College of Agricultural and Technological Sciences, Campus of Dracena-SP, 17900-000, Brazil.

Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, College of Agronomy, Department of Animal Science, Campus of Porto Alegre-RS, 91540-000, Brazil.

出版信息

Poult Sci. 2017 Oct 1;96(10):3645-3653. doi: 10.3382/ps/pex178.

Abstract

The effect of organic acids as an alternative to antibiotics on the performance of broiler chickens was evaluated by meta-analysis, identifying and quantifying the main factors that influence results. A total of 51,960 broilers from 121 articles published between 1991 and 2016 were used. Interactions of additives [non-supplemented group (control), organic acids, and growth promoter antibiotics] with microbial challenge (with or without inoculation of pathogenic microorganisms) were studied on performance variables. Moreover, the effects of organic acids, used individually or in blends, were evaluated. Relative values of average daily gain (ADG) and average daily feed intake (ADFI) were obtained in relation to control: ΔADG and ΔADFI, respectively. Analysis of variance-covariance revealed lower ADG with organic acids when compared to antibiotics (P < 0.05). There was a significant interaction between the additives and the challenge on feed conversion ratio (FCR) (P < 0.01) and on viability (P < 0.05). Without challenge, organic acids improved broilers' FCR (P < 0.01), presenting results similar to antibiotics (P > 0.05). Under challenge, the organic acids were again effective on FCR (-5.67% in relation to control, P < 0.05), but they did not match antibiotics (-13.40% in relation to control, P < 0.01). Viability was improved only under challenge conditions, and only by antibiotics (+4.39% in relation to control, P < 0.05). ADG (P < 0.05) and FCR (P < 0.01) were increased by blends of organic acids, but not by the organic acids used alone (P > 0.05). ADFI and production factor were not influenced by the treatments (P > 0.05). ΔADFI of organic-acid supplemented group showed a linear influence on ΔADG, which increases 0.64% at every 1% increase in ΔADFI. In conclusion, organic acids can be utilized as performance enhancing, but the results are lower than those found with antibiotics, particularly under microbial challenge. The blends of organic acids provide better results than the utilization of one organic acid alone.

摘要

采用荟萃分析评估了有机酸作为抗生素替代品对肉鸡生产性能的影响,确定并量化了影响结果的主要因素。共使用了 1991 年至 2016 年间发表的 121 篇文章中的 51960 只肉鸡。在性能变量方面,研究了添加剂(未添加组(对照)、有机酸和生长促进抗生素)与微生物挑战(是否接种致病微生物)之间的相互作用。此外,还评估了有机酸单独使用或混合使用的效果。相对于对照,获得了平均日增重(ADG)和平均日采食量(ADFI)的相对值:ΔADG 和 ΔADFI。方差协方差分析表明,与抗生素相比,有机酸的 ADG 较低(P < 0.05)。添加剂与挑战对饲料转化率(FCR)(P < 0.01)和成活率(P < 0.05)存在显著的相互作用。没有挑战时,有机酸可改善肉鸡的 FCR(P < 0.01),结果与抗生素相似(P > 0.05)。在有挑战的情况下,有机酸对 FCR 再次有效(与对照相比降低 5.67%,P < 0.05),但不及抗生素(与对照相比降低 13.40%,P < 0.01)。只有在有挑战的情况下,成活率才会提高,而且只有抗生素才能提高(与对照相比提高 4.39%,P < 0.05)。ADG(P < 0.05)和 FCR(P < 0.01)通过有机酸混合物增加,但单独使用有机酸则没有(P > 0.05)。ADFI 和生产因子不受处理的影响(P > 0.05)。有机酸添加组的 ΔADFI 对 ΔADG 呈线性影响,ΔADFI 每增加 1%,ΔADG 增加 0.64%。结论:有机酸可用作性能增强剂,但效果低于抗生素,尤其是在微生物挑战下。有机酸混合物的使用效果优于单一有机酸的使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff81/5850820/4b33937b2baf/pex178fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验