School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
Innovations for Poverty Action, Nairobi, Kenya.
Reprod Health. 2017 Sep 22;14(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0381-7.
Person-centered reproductive health care is recognized as critical to improving reproductive health outcomes. Yet, little research exists on how to operationalize it. We extend the literature in this area by developing and validating a tool to measure person-centered maternity care. We describe the process of developing the tool and present the results of psychometric analyses to assess its validity and reliability in a rural and urban setting in Kenya.
We followed standard procedures for scale development. First, we reviewed the literature to define our construct and identify domains, and developed items to measure each domain. Next, we conducted expert reviews to assess content validity; and cognitive interviews with potential respondents to assess clarity, appropriateness, and relevance of the questions. The questions were then refined and administered in surveys; and survey results used to assess construct and criterion validity and reliability.
The exploratory factor analysis yielded one dominant factor in both the rural and urban settings. Three factors with eigenvalues greater than one were identified for the rural sample and four factors identified for the urban sample. Thirty of the 38 items administered in the survey were retained based on the factors loadings and correlation between the items. Twenty-five items load very well onto a single factor in both the rural and urban sample, with five items loading well in either the rural or urban sample, but not in both samples. These 30 items also load on three sub-scales that we created to measure dignified and respectful care, communication and autonomy, and supportive care. The Chronbach alpha for the main scale is greater than 0.8 in both samples, and that for the sub-scales are between 0.6 and 0.8. The main scale and sub-scales are correlated with global measures of satisfaction with maternity services, suggesting criterion validity.
We present a 30-item scale with three sub-scales to measure person-centered maternity care. This scale has high validity and reliability in a rural and urban setting in Kenya. Validation in additional settings is however needed. This scale will facilitate measurement to improve person-centered maternity care, and subsequently improve reproductive outcomes.
以人为中心的生殖健康护理被认为是改善生殖健康结果的关键。然而,关于如何使其运作的研究甚少。我们通过开发和验证一种衡量以人为主导的产妇护理的工具,扩展了该领域的文献。我们描述了开发该工具的过程,并介绍了在肯尼亚农村和城市环境中评估其有效性和可靠性的心理测量分析结果。
我们遵循量表开发的标准程序。首先,我们查阅文献定义我们的构念并确定领域,并制定衡量每个领域的项目。接下来,我们进行了专家审查以评估内容有效性;并对潜在受访者进行认知访谈,以评估问题的清晰度、适当性和相关性。然后对问题进行了细化,并在调查中进行了管理;并使用调查结果评估构念和标准有效性和可靠性。
在农村和城市环境中,探索性因素分析都产生了一个主要因素。农村样本中确定了三个特征值大于一的因素,城市样本中确定了四个因素。根据因素负荷和项目之间的相关性,保留了调查中 38 个项目中的 30 个。25 个项目在农村和城市样本中很好地加载到单个因素上,而 5 个项目在农村或城市样本中很好地加载,但不在两个样本中。这 30 个项目也加载到我们创建的三个子量表上,用于衡量有尊严和尊重的护理、沟通和自主权以及支持性护理。两个样本的主要量表的 Cronbach 阿尔法大于 0.8,子量表的 Cronbach 阿尔法在 0.6 和 0.8 之间。主要量表和子量表与对产妇服务的整体满意度的全球衡量标准相关,表明具有标准有效性。
我们提出了一个包含 30 个项目的三个子量表的量表,用于衡量以人为主导的产妇护理。该量表在肯尼亚农村和城市环境中具有较高的有效性和可靠性。然而,在其他环境中需要进行验证。该量表将促进衡量标准以改善以人为中心的产妇护理,并随后改善生殖结果。