Inserm, CIC 1414 Clinical Investigation Centre, Rennes, France.
Fondation Saint Jean de Dieu, Centre Hospitalier Dinan/St Brieuc, Dinan, France.
Addiction. 2018 Feb;113(2):220-237. doi: 10.1111/add.13974. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
Pharmacologically controlled drinking in the treatment of alcohol dependence or alcohol use disorders (AUDs) is an emerging concept. Our objective was to explore the comparative effectiveness of drugs used in this indication.
Systematic review with direct and network meta-analysis of double-blind randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the efficacy of nalmefene, naltrexone, acamprosate, baclofen or topiramate in non-abstinent adults diagnosed with alcohol dependence or AUDs. Two independent reviewers selected published and unpublished studies on Medline, the Cochrane Library, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, contacted pharmaceutical companies, the European Medicines Agency and the Food and Drug Administration, and extracted data.
Thirty-two RCTs.
A total of 6036 patients.
The primary outcome was total alcohol consumption (TAC). Other consumption outcomes and health outcomes were considered as secondary outcomes.
No study provided direct comparisons between drugs. A risk of incomplete outcome data was identified in 26 studies (81%) and risk of selective outcome reporting in 17 (53%). Nalmefene [standardized mean difference (SMD) = -0.19, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.29, -0.10; I = 0%], baclofen (SMD = -1.00, 95% CI = -1.80, -0.19; one study) and topiramate (SMD = -0.77, 95% CI = -1.12, -0.42; I = 0%) showed superiority over placebo on TAC. No efficacy was observed for naltrexone or acamprosate. Similar results were observed for other consumption outcomes, except for baclofen (the favourable outcome on TAC was not reproduced). The number of withdrawals for safety reasons increased under nalmefene and naltrexone. No treatment demonstrated any harm reduction (no study was powered to explore health outcomes). Indirect comparisons suggested that topiramate was superior to nalmefene, naltrexone and acamprosate on consumption outcomes, but its safety profile is known to be poor.
There is currently no high-grade evidence for pharmacological treatment to control drinking using nalmefene, naltrexone, acamprosate, baclofen or topiramate in patients with alcohol dependence or alcohol use disorder. Some treatments show low to medium efficacy in reducing drinking across a range of studies with a high risk of bias. None demonstrates any benefit on health outcomes.
在治疗酒精依赖或酒精使用障碍(AUDs)方面,药物控制饮酒量是一种新兴的概念。我们的目的是探索该适应证中使用的药物的比较疗效。
对评估纳美芬、纳曲酮、安非他酮、巴氯芬或托吡酯在非戒酒的酒精依赖或 AUD 成人患者中的疗效的双盲随机对照试验(RCTs)进行系统评价和直接及网络荟萃分析。两名独立的审查员检索了 Medline、Cochrane 图书馆、Embase、ClinicalTrials.gov、联系了制药公司、欧洲药品管理局和美国食品和药物管理局,并提取了数据。
32 项 RCT。
共 6036 名患者。
主要结局指标为总酒精摄入量(TAC)。其他饮酒量和健康结局被视为次要结局指标。
没有研究提供药物之间的直接比较。26 项研究(81%)存在不完全结局数据风险,17 项研究(53%)存在选择性结局报告风险。纳美芬[标准化均数差(SMD)=-0.19,95%置信区间(CI)=-0.29,-0.10;I=0%]、巴氯芬(SMD=-1.00,95%CI=-1.80,-0.19;一项研究)和托吡酯(SMD=-0.77,95%CI=-1.12,-0.42;I=0%)在 TAC 方面优于安慰剂。纳曲酮或安非他酮没有疗效。其他饮酒量结局也观察到类似的结果,除了巴氯芬(TAC 的有利结局没有重现)。由于安全性原因,纳美芬和纳曲酮的退出人数增加。没有治疗方法显示出任何减少危害(没有研究有足够的能力来探索健康结局)。间接比较表明,托吡酯在饮酒量方面优于纳美芬、纳曲酮和安非他酮,但已知其安全性较差。
目前,对于使用纳美芬、纳曲酮、安非他酮、巴氯芬或托吡酯治疗酒精依赖或酒精使用障碍患者的药物治疗,没有高质量的证据。一些治疗方法在一系列存在高偏倚风险的研究中显示出了低至中等的减少饮酒量的疗效。没有任何治疗方法在健康结局方面显示出获益。