Population Research Center, Department of Human Development and Family Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
Population Research Center, Department of Human Development and Family Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
J Adolesc Health. 2017 Dec;61(6):729-735. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.06.024. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
The purpose of this study was to examine rates of substance use between transgender and nontransgender youth using a representative population-based sample and to examine mediating risk factors.
A statewide cross-sectional sample of California middle and high schools collected between 2013 and 2015. This representative sample of students in California included 335 transgender and 31,737 nontransgender youth. Using multivariate linear and logistic regression, we assessed differences between transgender and nontransgender youth in substance use behaviors related to alcohol, cigarette, marijuana, other illicit drugs, polysubstance use, and heavy episodic drinking. Substance use was assessed with lifetime use, age of onset, and past 30-day use for alcohol, cigarettes, and marijuana. Past 30-day use was also assessed for other illicit drugs and polysubstance use. Models were adjusted for demographics and risk factors including victimization, depressive symptoms, and perceived risk of substance use.
The prevalence of substance use was 2.5-4 times higher for transgender youth compared with their nontransgender peers (depending on the substance). Transgender youth were also at greater risk for early age of onset and recent substance use than nontransgender youth. In addition, psychosocial risk factors related to victimization, depressive symptoms, and perceived risk of substance use partially mediated the relationship between gender identity and substance use.
Using data from the first representative study of youth to include a measure of gender identity, we show that transgender youth are at heightened risk for substance use compared with nontransgender peers. Future research is needed to identify the structural and psychosocial mechanisms that drive these disparities.
本研究旨在使用具有代表性的基于人群的样本检查跨性别和非跨性别青年之间的物质使用率,并检查中介风险因素。
在 2013 年至 2015 年期间,对加利福尼亚州的中学和高中进行了一项全州范围的横断面样本收集。该样本包括加利福尼亚州的 335 名跨性别者和 31,737 名非跨性别者。使用多元线性和逻辑回归,我们评估了跨性别者和非跨性别者青年之间与酒精,香烟,大麻,其他非法药物,多物质使用和重度发作性饮酒有关的物质使用行为的差异。使用终生使用,发病年龄和过去 30 天的使用情况评估了酒精,香烟和大麻的物质使用情况。还评估了过去 30 天内其他非法药物和多物质的使用情况。调整了模型以适应人口统计学和风险因素,包括受害,抑郁症状和对物质使用的感知风险。
与非跨性别同龄人相比(取决于物质),跨性别青年的物质使用率高出 2.5-4 倍。与非跨性别青年相比,跨性别青年的发病年龄更早,最近物质使用的风险也更高。此外,与受害,抑郁症状和对物质使用的感知风险有关的心理社会风险因素部分中介了性别认同与物质使用之间的关系。
使用包括性别认同衡量标准的第一个针对青年的代表性研究数据,我们表明与非跨性别同龄人相比,跨性别青年的物质使用风险更高。需要进一步研究以确定导致这些差异的结构和心理社会机制。