Suppr超能文献

八旬结直肠癌患者腹腔镜手术的短期结局:单机构分析

Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery in octogenarians with colorectal cancer: a single-institution analysis.

作者信息

Miguchi Masashi, Yoshimitsu Masanori, Hakoda Keishi, Omori Ichiro, Kohashi Toshihiko, Hihara Jun, Ohdan Hideki, Hirabayashi Naoki

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Hiroshima City Asa Citizens Hospital, 2-1-1 Kabeminami, Asakita-ku, Hiroshima, 731-0293, Japan.

Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Applied Life Sciences, Institute of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.

出版信息

Surg Today. 2018 Mar;48(3):292-299. doi: 10.1007/s00595-017-1584-9. Epub 2017 Sep 25.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The number of elderly patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) treated with surgery has gradually increased. The aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term outcomes in patients ≥80 years of age who underwent laparoscopic or open surgery for CRC using a propensity score-matched analysis to make uniform the patient background characteristics affecting the postoperative morbidity and mortality.

METHODS

We compared the short-term outcomes of open vs. laparoscopic surgery in patients with CRC ≥80 years of age between 2010 and 2015. Fifty-two patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy for CRC were matched to 52 patients undergoing open colectomy with respect to gender, age, body mass index, performance status, prognostic nutritional index, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, tumor-node-metastasis stage, and tumor location. The operative time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications were investigated.

RESULTS

Blood loss was less during laparoscopic surgery than during open surgery (40 vs. 140 ml, p < 0.001). In the laparoscopic surgery group, the hospital stay was shorter (11 vs. 14 days, p < 0.001) and the morbidity rate lower (21.2 vs. 40.4%) than in the open surgery group. The mortality for both groups was similar (0 vs. 1.9% for laparoscopic surgery vs. open surgery).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic surgery in octogenarians with CRC is a safe, low-invasive alternative to open surgery with less blood loss and a shorter hospital stay.

摘要

目的

接受手术治疗的老年结直肠癌(CRC)患者数量逐渐增加。本研究旨在评估年龄≥80岁的接受腹腔镜或开放手术治疗CRC患者的短期结局,采用倾向评分匹配分析使影响术后发病率和死亡率的患者背景特征趋于一致。

方法

我们比较了2010年至2015年间年龄≥80岁的CRC患者接受开放手术与腹腔镜手术的短期结局。52例行腹腔镜结肠切除术治疗CRC的患者与52例行开放结肠切除术的患者在性别、年龄、体重指数、体能状态、预后营养指数、Charlson合并症指数评分、肿瘤-淋巴结-转移分期及肿瘤位置方面进行匹配。对手术时间、失血量、住院时间及术后并发症进行了调查。

结果

腹腔镜手术期间的失血量少于开放手术(40 vs. 140 ml,p < 0.001)。腹腔镜手术组的住院时间更短(11 vs. 14天,p < 0.001),发病率更低(21.2% vs. 40.4%)。两组的死亡率相似(腹腔镜手术组为0,开放手术组为1.9%)。

结论

对于八旬CRC患者,腹腔镜手术是一种安全、低侵袭性的替代开放手术的方法,失血量更少,住院时间更短。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验