Suppr超能文献

丹麦骑自行车者和驾驶者的愤怒表达:基于特定模式愤怒表达量表的比较。

Anger expression among Danish cyclists and drivers: A comparison based on mode specific anger expression inventories.

作者信息

Møller M, Haustein S

机构信息

Technical University of Denmark, Department of Management Engineering, DK-2800 Kgs., Lyngby, Denmark.

Technical University of Denmark, Department of Management Engineering, DK-2800 Kgs., Lyngby, Denmark.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Nov;108:354-360. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.09.016. Epub 2017 Sep 26.

Abstract

Based on the short form of the driving anger expression inventory (DAX-short, 15-item), the present study developed an adapted version of the DAX for cyclists (CAX, 14 items). The data basis was an online survey of 2000 inhabitants of Denmark. A principle component analysis on the translated DAX-short confirmed the 4-factor solution of the original study differentiating between (1) personal physical aggressive expression, (2) use of a vehicle to express anger, (3) verbal aggressive expression and (4) adaptive/constructive expression. In case of cycling, the factor "use of a vehicle to express anger" only included one item and was left out. Based on the results, reliable subscales were developed. Drivers scored higher in verbal aggressive expression than cyclists, while there was no significant difference in constructive expression. The subscales for drivers and cyclists showed significant relations to age, gender, self-reported aggressive behaviours and traffic fines: Women scored for instance lower in physical expression, while older people scored higher in constructive expression. The effect of age and gender on anger expression among drivers and cyclists remained significant when controlling for exposure and other factors in linear regression analyses. These analyses also showed a relationship between a positive attitude towards driving and higher levels of anger expression among drivers, while this was not the case for cyclists.

摘要

基于驾驶愤怒表达量表简版(DAX - 简版,15项),本研究开发了适用于骑行者的DAX改编版(CAX,14项)。数据来源于对2000名丹麦居民的在线调查。对翻译后的DAX - 简版进行主成分分析,证实了原研究的四因素结构,即区分(1)个人身体攻击性行为表达、(2)利用车辆表达愤怒、(3)言语攻击性行为表达和(4)适应性/建设性表达。对于骑行而言,“利用车辆表达愤怒”这一因素仅包含一项,故将其排除。基于研究结果,开发出了可靠的分量表。驾驶者在言语攻击性行为表达方面的得分高于骑行者,而在建设性表达方面则无显著差异。驾驶者和骑行者的分量表得分与年龄、性别、自我报告的攻击性行为及交通罚款存在显著关联:例如,女性在身体攻击性行为表达方面得分较低,而年长者在建设性表达方面得分较高。在控制暴露因素和其他因素的线性回归分析中,年龄和性别对驾驶者及骑行者愤怒表达的影响依然显著。这些分析还表明,驾驶者对驾驶的积极态度与更高水平的愤怒表达之间存在关联,而骑行者并非如此。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验