Stambler Ilia
Department of Science, Technology and Society, Bar Ilan University, Israel.
Aging Dis. 2017 Oct 1;8(5):583-589. doi: 10.14336/AD.2017.0130. eCollection 2017 Oct.
It is becoming increasingly clear that in order to accomplish healthy longevity for the population, there is an urgent need for the research and development of effective therapies against degenerative aging processes underlying major aging-related diseases, including heart disease, neurodegenerative diseases, type 2 diabetes, cancer, pulmonary obstructive diseases, as well as aging-related complications and susceptibilities of infectious communicable diseases. Yet, an important incentive for the research and development of such therapies appears to be the development of clinically applicable and scientifically grounded definitions and criteria for the multifactorial degenerative aging process (or "senility" using the existing ICD category), underlying those diseases, as well as for the safety and effectiveness of interventions against it. Such generally agreed definitions and criteria are currently absent. The devising of such criteria is important not only for the sake of their scientific value and their utility for the development of therapeutic solutions for the aging population, but also to comply with and implement major existing national and international programmatic and regulatory requirements. Some methodological suggestions and potential pitfalls for the development of such criteria are examined.
越来越明显的是,为了实现人口的健康长寿,迫切需要研发针对主要衰老相关疾病(包括心脏病、神经退行性疾病、2型糖尿病、癌症、慢性阻塞性肺疾病)以及衰老相关并发症和传染病易感性背后的退行性衰老过程的有效疗法。然而,研发此类疗法的一个重要激励因素似乎是为这些疾病背后的多因素退行性衰老过程(或使用现有国际疾病分类类别中的“衰老”)以及针对该过程的干预措施的安全性和有效性制定临床适用且有科学依据的定义和标准。目前还没有这样普遍认可的定义和标准。制定此类标准不仅因其科学价值以及对老年人群治疗方案开发的实用性很重要,而且对于遵守和实施现有的主要国家和国际计划及监管要求也很重要。本文探讨了制定此类标准的一些方法建议和潜在陷阱。