Department of Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Medical Oncology, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.
Eur Urol. 2018 Jan;73(1):62-68. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.09.008. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
Adjuvant sunitinib significantly improved disease-free survival (DFS) versus placebo in patients with locoregional renal cell carcinoma (RCC) at high risk of recurrence after nephrectomy (hazard ratio [HR] 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-0.98; p=0.03).
To report the relationship between baseline factors and DFS, pattern of recurrence, and updated overall survival (OS).
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Data for 615 patients randomized to sunitinib (n=309) or placebo (n=306) in the S-TRAC trial.
Subgroup DFS analyses by baseline risk factors were conducted using a Cox proportional hazards model. Baseline risk factors included: modified University of California Los Angeles integrated staging system criteria, age, gender, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), weight, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and Fuhrman grade.
Of 615 patients, 97 and 122 in the sunitinib and placebo arms developed metastatic disease, with the most common sites of distant recurrence being lung (40 and 49), lymph node (21 and 26), and liver (11 and 14), respectively. A benefit of adjuvant sunitinib over placebo was observed across subgroups, including: higher risk (T3, no or undetermined nodal involvement, Fuhrman grade ≥2, ECOG PS ≥1, T4 and/or nodal involvement; hazard ratio [HR] 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55-0.99; p=0.04), NLR ≤3 (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.54-0.95; p=0.02), and Fuhrman grade 3/4 (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.55-0.98; p=0.04). All subgroup analyses were exploratory, and no adjustments for multiplicity were made. Median OS was not reached in either arm (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.66-1.28; p=0.6); 67 and 74 patients died in the sunitinib and placebo arms, respectively.
A benefit of adjuvant sunitinib over placebo was observed across subgroups. The results are consistent with the primary analysis, which showed a benefit for adjuvant sunitinib in patients at high risk of recurrent RCC after nephrectomy.
Most subgroups of patients at high risk of recurrent renal cell carcinoma after nephrectomy experienced a clinical benefit with adjuvant sunitinib.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00375674.
辅助舒尼替尼显著改善了局部肾细胞癌(RCC)患者的无病生存期(DFS),这些患者在肾切除术后有复发的高风险(风险比[HR]0.76,95%置信区间[CI]0.59-0.98;p=0.03)。
报告与基线因素、复发模式以及更新的总生存期(OS)相关的DFS 关系。
设计、地点和参与者:S-TRAC 试验中随机分配至舒尼替尼(n=309)或安慰剂(n=306)的 615 名患者的数据。
使用 Cox 比例风险模型对基线风险因素进行了亚组 DFS 分析。基线风险因素包括:改良加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校(UCLA)综合分期系统标准、年龄、性别、东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)体能状态(PS)、体重、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)和 Fuhrman 分级。
在 615 名患者中,舒尼替尼组和安慰剂组分别有 97 名和 122 名患者发生转移性疾病,远处复发最常见的部位是肺(40 例和 49 例)、淋巴结(21 例和 26 例)和肝脏(11 例和 14 例)。与安慰剂相比,辅助舒尼替尼在各个亚组中均观察到获益,包括:更高的风险(T3、无或不确定的淋巴结受累、Fuhrman 分级≥2、ECOG PS≥1、T4 和/或淋巴结受累;HR 0.74,95%CI 0.55-0.99;p=0.04)、NLR≤3(HR 0.72,95%CI 0.54-0.95;p=0.02)和 Fuhrman 分级 3/4(HR 0.73,95%CI 0.55-0.98;p=0.04)。所有亚组分析均为探索性分析,未进行多重性调整。两个治疗组均未达到中位 OS(HR 0.92,95%CI 0.66-1.28;p=0.6);分别有 67 名和 74 名患者在舒尼替尼组和安慰剂组死亡。
与安慰剂相比,辅助舒尼替尼在各个亚组中均观察到获益。这些结果与主要分析一致,表明在肾切除术后有 RCC 复发高风险的患者中,辅助舒尼替尼具有获益。
肾切除术后有 RCC 复发高风险的大多数患者亚组,辅助舒尼替尼均具有临床获益。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00375674。