Nobuyuki Katakami, Institute of Biomedical Research and Innovation, Kobe; Toshiyuki Harada, Japan Community Healthcare Organization Hokkaido Hospital, Sapporo; Toru Murata, Aichi Hospital, Okazaki; Katsunori Shinozaki, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, Hiroshima; Masakazu Tsutsumi, Hitachi General Hospital, Hitachi; Takaaki Yokota, Masatsugu Arai, and Yukio Tada, Shionogi & Co Ltd, Osaka; Masaru Narabayashi, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research; and Narikazu Boku, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 1;35(34):3859-3866. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.73.0853. Epub 2017 Oct 2.
Purpose Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is a frequent and debilitating adverse effect (AE) of opioids-common analgesics for cancer pain. We investigated the efficacy and safety of a peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonist, naldemedine (S-297995), for OIC, specifically in patients with cancer. Patients and Methods This phase III trial consisted of a 2-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (COMPOSE-4) and an open-label, 12-week extension study (COMPOSE-5). In COMPOSE-4, eligible adults with OIC and cancer were randomly assigned on a 1:1 basis to receive once-daily oral naldemedine 0.2 mg or placebo. The primary end point was the proportion of spontaneous bowel movement (SBM) responders (≥ 3 SBMs/week and an increase of ≥ 1 SBM/week from baseline). The primary end point of COMPOSE-5 was safety. Results In COMPOSE-4, 193 eligible patients were randomly assigned to naldemedine (n = 97) or placebo (n = 96). The proportion of SBM responders in COMPOSE-4 was significantly greater with naldemedine than with placebo (71.1% [69 of 97 patients] v 34.4% [33 of 96 patients]; P < .0001). A greater change from baseline was observed with naldemedine than with placebo in the frequency of SBMs/week (5.16 v 1.54; P < .0001), SBMs with complete bowel evacuation/week (2.76 v 0.71; P < .0001), and SBMs without straining/week (3.85 v 1.17; P = .0005). In COMPOSE-4, more patients treated with naldemedine than with placebo reported treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) (44.3% [43 of 97 patients] v 26.0% [25 of 96 patients]; P = .01); in COMPOSE-5, 105 (80.2%) of 131 of patients reported TEAEs. Diarrhea was the most frequently reported TEAE in COMPOSE-4 (19.6% [19 of 97 patients] v 7.3% [seven of 96 patients] with naldemedine v placebo) and COMPOSE-5 (18.3% [24 of 131 patients] with naldemedine). Naldemedine was not associated with signs or symptoms of opioid withdrawal and had no notable impact on opioid-mediated analgesia. Conclusion Once-daily oral naldemedine 0.2 mg effectively treated OIC and was generally well tolerated in patients with OIC and cancer.
目的 阿片诱导的便秘(OIC)是阿片类药物(癌症疼痛的常用镇痛药)常见的不良反应(AE)。我们研究了外周作用μ阿片受体拮抗剂纳美芬(S-297995)对 OIC 的疗效和安全性,特别是在癌症患者中。
患者和方法 这项 III 期试验包括一项为期 2 周的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究(COMPOSE-4)和一项开放标签、12 周扩展研究(COMPOSE-5)。在 COMPOSE-4 中,患有 OIC 和癌症的合格成年人按 1:1 的比例随机接受每日一次口服纳美芬 0.2 mg 或安慰剂。主要终点是自发排便(SBM)应答者的比例(每周≥3 次 SBM,与基线相比每周增加≥1 次 SBM)。COMPOSE-5 的主要终点是安全性。
结果 在 COMPOSE-4 中,193 名符合条件的患者被随机分配至纳美芬(n=97)或安慰剂(n=96)。与安慰剂相比,纳美芬治疗的患者 SBM 应答者比例显著更高(71.1%[97 例患者中的 69 例]vs 34.4%[96 例患者中的 33 例];P<.0001)。与安慰剂相比,纳美芬治疗患者每周 SBM 频率(5.16 比 1.54;P<.0001)、每周完全排便 SBM 次数(2.76 比 0.71;P<.0001)和每周无费力 SBM 次数(3.85 比 1.17;P=0.0005)均有更大改善。在 COMPOSE-4 中,接受纳美芬治疗的患者比接受安慰剂治疗的患者报告的治疗相关不良事件(TEAE)更多(44.3%[97 例患者中的 43 例]vs 26.0%[96 例患者中的 25 例];P=0.01);在 COMPOSE-5 中,105(80.2%)例患者报告了 TEAEs。腹泻是 COMPOSE-4(纳美芬 19.6%[97 例患者中的 19 例]vs 安慰剂 7.3%[96 例患者中的 7 例])和 COMPOSE-5(纳美芬 18.3%[131 例患者中的 24 例])中最常报告的 TEAEs。纳美芬与阿片类药物戒断的体征或症状无关,对阿片类药物介导的镇痛没有明显影响。
结论 每日一次口服纳美芬 0.2 mg 可有效治疗 OIC,且在患有 OIC 和癌症的患者中总体耐受性良好。