Division of Trauma and Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center, Department of Surgery, Center for Healthcare Studies, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
JAMA Surg. 2018 Feb 1;153(2):107-113. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.3601.
Time to definitive care following injury is important to the outcomes of trauma patients. Prehospital trauma care is provided based on policies developed by individual trauma systems and is an important component of the care of injured patients. Given a paucity of systems-level trauma research, considerable variability exists in prehospital care policies across trauma systems, potentially affecting patient outcomes.
To evaluate whether private vehicle prehospital transport confers a survival advantage vs ground emergency medical services (EMS) transport following penetrating injuries in urban trauma systems.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective cohort study of data included in the National Trauma Data Bank from January 1, 2010, through December 31, 2012, comprising 298 level 1 and level 2 trauma centers that contribute data to the National Trauma Data Bank that are located within the 100 most populous metropolitan areas in the United States. Of 2 329 446 patients assessed for eligibility, 103 029 were included in this study. All patients were 16 years or older, had a gunshot wound or stab wound, and were transported by ground EMS or private vehicle.
In-hospital mortality.
Of the 2 329 446 records assessed for eligibility, 103 029 individuals at 298 urban level 1 and level 2 trauma centers were included in the analysis. The study population was predominantly male (87.6%), with a mean age of 32.3 years. Among those included, 47.9% were black, 26.3% were white, and 18.4% were Hispanic. Following risk adjustment, individuals with penetrating injuries transported by private vehicle were less likely to die than patients transported by ground EMS (odds ratio [OR], 0.38; 95% CI, 0.31-0.47). This association remained statistically significant on stratified analysis of the gunshot wound (OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.36-0.56) and stab wound (OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.20-0.52) subgroups.
Private vehicle transport is associated with a significantly lower likelihood of death when compared with ground EMS transport for individuals with gunshot wounds and stab wounds in urban US trauma systems. System-level evidence such as this can be a valuable tool for those responsible for developing and implementing policies at the trauma system level.
受伤后接受确定性治疗的时间对创伤患者的结局至关重要。院前创伤护理是根据各个创伤系统制定的政策提供的,是受伤患者护理的重要组成部分。由于缺乏系统层面的创伤研究,不同创伤系统之间的院前护理政策存在很大差异,这可能会影响患者的结局。
评估在城市创伤系统中,与地面紧急医疗服务(EMS)相比,私家车院前转运是否会为穿透性损伤患者带来生存优势。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项回顾性队列研究,数据来自国家创伤数据库,时间为 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2012 年 12 月 31 日,包括美国 100 个人口最多的大都市区内的 298 个 1 级和 2 级创伤中心。在评估的 2329446 例符合条件的患者中,有 103029 例患者纳入本研究。所有患者年龄均在 16 岁或以上,有枪伤或刺伤,且通过地面 EMS 或私家车转运。
院内死亡率。
在评估的 2329446 份记录中,有 103029 名患者来自 298 个城市 1 级和 2 级创伤中心,符合入选标准。研究人群主要为男性(87.6%),平均年龄为 32.3 岁。其中,47.9%为黑人,26.3%为白人,18.4%为西班牙裔。经过风险调整后,与通过地面 EMS 转运的患者相比,私家车转运的穿透性损伤患者死亡的可能性更低(比值比[OR],0.38;95%置信区间[CI],0.31-0.47)。这种关联在对枪伤(OR,0.45;95%CI,0.36-0.56)和刺伤(OR,0.32;95%CI,0.20-0.52)亚组的分层分析中仍然具有统计学意义。
与地面 EMS 转运相比,在美国城市创伤系统中,私家车转运与因枪伤和刺伤而受伤的个体的死亡风险显著降低相关。此类系统层面的证据可以为那些负责制定和实施创伤系统层面政策的人提供有价值的工具。