Dept of Radiology, Shapiro Clinical Center, 4th Floor, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Ave., Boston MA 02215, United States.
Dept of Radiology, Shapiro Clinical Center, 4th Floor, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Ave., Boston MA 02215, United States.
Eur J Radiol. 2017 Oct;95:319-324. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.08.018. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
Incidental hepatic lesions identified on breast MR can be a diagnostic dilemma due to concern for liver metastases or other significant hepatic lesions. The purpose of this study was to identify the incidence and nature of liver lesions seen on breast MR, and determine if additional imaging is necessary.
Imaging reports of all breast MR examinations performed at our institution from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2011 were reviewed to identify reports with hepatic abnormalities. Lesion characteristics, subsequent diagnosis, duration of follow up and additional imaging results (if performed) were all recorded.
Of 1664 breast MRs, incidental hepatic lesions were seen in 207 studies (12.4%) in 169 patients. In 154 of 169 patients (91.1%) the lesions were characterized as T2 hyperintense and clearly as bright as adjacent fat on T2-weighted or localizer sequences. 0 of these 154 lesions were clinically significant at clinical or radiological follow-up. In the remaining 8.9% (15 of 169), lesions were characterized as not as bright as adjacent fat on T2 weighted or localizer imaging. In two cases, lesions were confirmed as incidental hepatic metastatic disease.
91.1% of incidental hepatic lesions were circumscribed, T2 hyperintense lesions and characterised as clearly as bright as adjacent fat on T2 weighted imaging at additional review. None of which were clinically significant at clinical or radiological follow-up. We advocate that circumscribed T2 hyperintense lesions which are clearly as bright as adjacent fat on T2 weighted imaging are of unlikely clinical significance and follow-up imaging should not be recommended, reducing the rate of additional imaging from 37.3% to 5.3%.
由于担心肝转移或其他重大肝病变,乳腺磁共振成像(MR)偶然发现的肝脏病变可能会造成诊断上的困扰。本研究旨在确定乳腺 MR 上所见肝脏病变的发生率和性质,并确定是否需要额外的影像学检查。
回顾性分析 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2011 年 12 月 31 日在我院进行的所有乳腺 MR 检查的影像报告,以确定报告中存在肝异常的病例。记录病变特征、后续诊断、随访时间以及(如有进行)额外影像学检查结果。
在 1664 例乳腺 MR 中,169 例患者的 207 项研究(12.4%)中偶然发现了肝内病变。在 169 例患者中的 154 例(91.1%)中,病变在 T2 加权像或定位序列上表现为 T2 高信号,与相邻脂肪信号相比明显明亮。在临床或放射学随访中,这些病变中没有 1 例具有临床意义。在其余的 8.9%(15/169)中,病变在 T2 加权像或定位成像上表现为不如相邻脂肪亮。在 2 例中,病变被证实为偶然发现的肝转移病变。
在额外的回顾性评估中,91.1%的偶然肝内病变为边界清楚的 T2 高信号病变,在 T2 加权成像上与相邻脂肪信号相比表现为明显明亮。在临床或放射学随访中,这些病变均无临床意义。我们主张,边界清楚的 T2 高信号病变,在 T2 加权成像上与相邻脂肪信号相比表现为明显明亮,其临床意义不大,不需要推荐进行随访影像学检查,这将使额外影像学检查的比例从 37.3%降至 5.3%。