University of Messina, Department of Humanities and Social Sciences - Psychology Unit, 1 Bivona st., 98122 Messina, Italy.
Family Resiliency Center, Department of Human Development and Family Studies, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, 904 W. Nevada, MC-081, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
J Affect Disord. 2018 Jan 15;226:178-187. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.09.046. Epub 2017 Oct 2.
Stress affects people of all ages, genders, and cultures and is associated with physical and psychological complications. Stressful life events are an important research focus and a psychometrically valid measure could provide useful clinical information. The purpose of the study was to develop a reliable and valid measurement of stressful life events and to assess its reliability and validity using established measures of social support, stress, depression, anxiety and maternal and child health.
The authors used an adaptation from the Social Readjustment Rating Scale (SRRS) to describe the prevalence of life events; they developed a 4-factor stressful life events subscales and used Medical Outcomes Social Support Scale, Social Support Scale, Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale and 14 general health items for validity analysis. Analyses were performed with descriptive statistics, Cronbach's alpha, Spearman's rho, Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test and Wilcoxon 2-sample test.
The 4-factor stressful life events subscales showed acceptable reliability. The resulting subscale scores were significantly associated with established measures of social support, depression, anxiety, stress, and caregiver health indicators.
The study presented a number of limitations in terms of design and recall bias.
Despite the presence of a number of limitations, the study provided valuable insight and suggested that further investigation is needed in order to determine the effectiveness of the measures in revealing the family's wellbeing and to develop and strengthen a more detailed analysis of the stressful life events/health association.
压力影响着各个年龄段、性别和文化的人,与身心并发症有关。生活应激事件是一个重要的研究焦点,一个具有心理测量学效度的衡量标准可以提供有用的临床信息。本研究的目的是开发一个可靠和有效的生活应激事件衡量标准,并使用社会支持、压力、抑郁、焦虑和母婴健康的既定衡量标准来评估其信度和效度。
作者采用社会再适应评定量表(SRRS)的改编版来描述生活事件的发生率;他们开发了一个 4 因素生活应激事件子量表,并使用医疗结局社会支持量表、社会支持量表、抑郁、焦虑和压力量表以及 14 个一般健康项目进行有效性分析。分析采用描述性统计、克朗巴赫 α 系数、斯皮尔曼 ρ 系数、卡方检验或 Fisher 确切概率检验和 Wilcoxon 2 样本检验。
4 因素生活应激事件子量表具有可接受的信度。所得子量表得分与社会支持、抑郁、焦虑、压力和照顾者健康指标的既定衡量标准显著相关。
该研究在设计和回忆偏倚方面存在一些局限性。
尽管存在一些局限性,但该研究提供了有价值的见解,并表明需要进一步研究以确定这些衡量标准在揭示家庭健康方面的有效性,并开发和加强对生活应激事件/健康关联的更详细分析。