Katrak Shereen, Murphy Maxwell, Nayebare Patience, Rek John, Smith Mary, Arinaitwe Emmanuel, Nankabirwa Joaniter I, Kamya Moses, Dorsey Grant, Rosenthal Philip J, Greenhouse Bryan
Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017 Dec;97(6):1777-1781. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.17-0225. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
Accurately identifying and targeting the human reservoir of malaria parasitemia is critical for malaria control, and requires a reliable and sensitive diagnostic method. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) is increasingly used to diagnose submicroscopic parasitemia. Although most published studies report the sensitivity of LAMP compared with nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as ≥ 80%, they have failed to use a consistent, sensitive diagnostic as a comparator. We used cross-sectional samples from children and adults in Tororo, Uganda, a region with high but declining transmission due to indoor residual spraying, to characterize the sensitivity and specificity of pan- LAMP for detecting submicroscopic infections. We compared LAMP results targeting a mitochondrial DNA sequence conserved in all species, performed on DNA extracted from dried blood spots, to those of a gold standard quantitative PCR assay targeting the gene acidic terminal sequence of (ATS qPCR), performed on DNA extracted from 200 µL of whole blood. Using LAMP and ATS qPCR increased the detection of parasitemia 2- to 5-fold, compared with microscopy. Among microscopy-negative samples, the sensitivity of LAMP was 81.5% for detecting infection ≥ 1 parasites/µL. However, low density infections were common, and LAMP failed to identify more than half of all infections diagnosed by ATS qPCR, performing with an overall sensitivity of 44.7% for detecting submicroscopic infections ≥ 0.01 parasites/µL. Thus, although the LAMP assay is more sensitive than microscopy, it missed a significant portion of the submicroscopic reservoir. These findings have important implications for malaria control, particularly in settings where low-density infections predominate.
准确识别和定位疟疾寄生虫血症的人类储存宿主对于疟疾控制至关重要,这需要一种可靠且灵敏的诊断方法。环介导等温扩增技术(LAMP)越来越多地用于诊断亚显微水平的寄生虫血症。尽管大多数已发表的研究报告称,与巢式聚合酶链反应(PCR)相比,LAMP的灵敏度≥80%,但它们未能使用一种一致、灵敏的诊断方法作为对照。我们使用了来自乌干达托罗罗地区儿童和成人的横断面样本,该地区由于室内滞留喷洒,疟疾传播率虽高但呈下降趋势,以表征泛LAMP检测亚显微感染的灵敏度和特异性。我们将针对所有疟原虫物种中保守的线粒体DNA序列进行的LAMP结果(对从干血斑中提取的DNA进行检测)与针对疟原虫酸性末端序列(ATS qPCR)的金标准定量PCR检测结果(对从200µL全血中提取的DNA进行检测)进行了比较。与显微镜检查相比,使用LAMP和ATS qPCR可将寄生虫血症的检测率提高2至5倍。在显微镜检查阴性的样本中,LAMP检测≥1个寄生虫/µL感染的灵敏度为81.5%。然而,低密度感染很常见,LAMP未能识别出ATS qPCR诊断出的所有感染中的一半以上,检测≥0.01个寄生虫/µL亚显微感染的总体灵敏度为44.7%。因此,尽管LAMP检测比显微镜检查更灵敏,但它遗漏了很大一部分亚显微水平的储存宿主。这些发现对疟疾控制具有重要意义,尤其是在低密度感染占主导的环境中。