Taylor Celia, Griffiths Frances, Lilford Richard
Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
BMJ Glob Health. 2017 Sep 25;2(3):e000391. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000391. eCollection 2017.
Community health worker (CHW) programmes have low costs per person served and are central to achieving universal healthcare. However, their total cost is high and the target of one million CHWs for sub-Saharan Africa by 2015 was not met. We consider the affordability of rural CHW programmes by estimating total programme costs relative to national healthcare expenditure at different CHW salaries and resources available for healthcare.
We combine an existing source of rural CHW programme costs with World Bank data to estimate relative CHW programme costs in 37 countries. We consider three 'salaries' (CHWs as volunteers, paid the local equivalent of US$80 per month and paid the national minimum wage) and four potential healthcare budgets (both actual and Abuja declaration allocations alone and increased by external funding received and potential foreign aid, respectively). Costs are shown in 2012 nominal US$.
With CHWs paid the local equivalent of US$80 per month and financed from existing central government healthcare budgets, the median relative cost of a CHW programme would be 27% of the healthcare budget. While less than 2.5% in five countries (Botswana, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, Namibia and South Africa), this relative cost would exceed 100% in three (Chad, Eritrea and Niger). There is a strong negative linear relationship (R=0.83, p<0.001) between the natural logs of gross domestic product (GDP) per capita and affordability. In 23 countries with GDP per capita under US$1200, the cost of a CHW programme would exceed 12% of actual healthcare spending if CHWs were paid US$80 per month.
CHWs may be a stepping stone to universal access to professional healthcare, but there is high variability in the affordability of CHW programmes across sub-Saharan Africa. In many countries, such programmes are not yet affordable unless significant foreign aid is received.
社区卫生工作者(CHW)项目人均成本较低,是实现全民医疗保健的核心。然而,其总成本较高,到2015年为撒哈拉以南非洲地区配备100万名社区卫生工作者的目标未能实现。我们通过估算不同社区卫生工作者薪资水平及可用于医疗保健的资源情况下的项目总成本,来考量农村社区卫生工作者项目的可承受性。
我们将现有的农村社区卫生工作者项目成本来源与世界银行数据相结合,以估算37个国家的社区卫生工作者项目相对成本。我们考虑三种“薪资”水平(社区卫生工作者为志愿者、支付相当于每月80美元的当地薪资以及支付国家最低工资)以及四种潜在医疗保健预算(仅实际预算和《阿布贾宣言》拨款,以及分别加上所获外部资金和潜在外国援助后的增加额)。成本以2012年名义美元显示。
若社区卫生工作者每月获得相当于80美元的当地薪资,并由中央政府现有医疗保健预算提供资金,社区卫生工作者项目的相对成本中位数将占医疗保健预算的27%。在五个国家(博茨瓦纳、赤道几内亚、加蓬、纳米比亚和南非)该比例低于2.5%,而在三个国家(乍得、厄立特里亚和尼日尔)该相对成本将超过100%。人均国内生产总值(GDP)的自然对数与可承受性之间存在强烈的负线性关系(R = 0.83,p < 0.001)。在人均GDP低于1200美元的23个国家,如果社区卫生工作者每月薪资为80美元,社区卫生工作者项目的成本将超过实际医疗保健支出的12%。
社区卫生工作者可能是实现全民获得专业医疗保健的一块垫脚石,但撒哈拉以南非洲地区社区卫生工作者项目的可承受性存在很大差异。在许多国家,除非获得大量外国援助,此类项目目前仍难以承受。