College of Information Sciences and Technology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
College of Information Sciences and Technology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Cognition. 2018 Jan;170:147-163. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.09.018. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
The principle of entropy rate constancy (ERC) states that language users distribute information such that words tend to be equally predictable given previous contexts. We examine the applicability of this principle to spoken dialogue, as previous findings primarily rest on written text. The study takes into account the joint-activity nature of dialogue and the topic shift mechanisms that are different from monologue. It examines how the information contributions from the two dialogue partners interactively evolve as the discourse develops. The increase of local sentence-level information density (predicted by ERC) is shown to apply to dialogue overall. However, when the different roles of interlocutors in introducing new topics are identified, their contribution in information content displays a new converging pattern. We draw explanations to this pattern from multiple perspectives: Casting dialogue as an information exchange system would mean that the pattern is the result of two interlocutors maintaining their own context rather than sharing one. Second, we present some empirical evidence that a model of Interactive Alignment may include information density to explain the effect. Third, we argue that building common ground is a process analogous to information convergence. Thus, we put forward an information-theoretic view of dialogue, under which some existing theories of human dialogue may eventually be unified.
熵率守恒(ERC)原则指出,语言使用者在分配信息时,倾向于使给定先前语境的单词具有相同的可预测性。我们检验了该原则在口语对话中的适用性,因为先前的发现主要基于书面文本。该研究考虑到对话的联合活动性质以及与独白不同的话题转换机制。它研究了随着话语的发展,两个对话伙伴的信息贡献如何相互作用地演变。信息密度的局部句子级增加(由 ERC 预测)适用于整个对话。但是,当识别出对话者在引入新主题时的不同角色时,他们在信息内容方面的贡献显示出一种新的收敛模式。我们从多个角度对这种模式进行了解释:将对话视为信息交换系统,这意味着该模式是两个对话者保持自己的语境而不是共享一个语境的结果。其次,我们提出了一些实证证据,表明交互对齐模型可能包括信息密度来解释这种效果。第三,我们认为建立共同基础是一个类似于信息收敛的过程。因此,我们提出了一种对话的信息论观点,根据该观点,人类对话的一些现有理论最终可能会统一起来。