Mansuri Banafshe, Tohidast Seyed Abolfazl, Soltaninejad Nasibe, Kamali Mohammad, Ghelichi Leila, Azimi Hadi
Department of Speech and Language Pathology, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Neuromuscular Rehabilitation Research Center, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran.
J Voice. 2018 Sep;32(5):609-620. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.08.023. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
The aim of the present systematic review was to investigate the nonmedical treatments of vocal fold nodules (VFNs).
The present study is a systematic review.
The following electronic databases were searched from inception until August 2016: PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Ovid, ISI (Web of Sciences), Cochrane, PsychINFO, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar. Reference lists of included articles were evaluated for additional data. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines were used to carry out and report the review. The methodological quality of the articles included was evaluated using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale. Due to the heterogeneity of the studies, a narrative synthesis of the evidence was performed to summarize the evidence.
Out of 2,099 records identified, 21 articles met the inclusion criteria and thus were included in the review. The studies investigated in the present review were different in terms of study design, participant characteristics, types of assessments and treatments, and treatment delivery. However, nonmedical treatments of VFNs were found to be successful in improving vocal quality, decreasing VFN sizes, and resolving these nodules.
The results of the present review could provide primary evidence related to the effectiveness of nonmedical treatment of VFNs. Yet further studies with a high level of evidence, a rigorous methodological quality, and long-term follow-up evaluations are required to make stronger claims.
本系统评价旨在研究声带小结(VFNs)的非医学治疗方法。
本研究为系统评价。
检索了以下电子数据库,从建库至2016年8月:PubMed、Scopus、ScienceDirect、Ovid、ISI(科学引文索引)、Cochrane、PsychINFO、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库和谷歌学术。对纳入文章的参考文献列表进行评估以获取更多数据。使用系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目指南进行并报告本评价。采用物理治疗证据数据库量表评估纳入文章的方法学质量。由于研究的异质性,对证据进行了叙述性综合以总结证据。
在识别出的2099条记录中,21篇文章符合纳入标准,因此被纳入本评价。本评价中所研究的各项研究在研究设计、参与者特征、评估和治疗类型以及治疗实施方面存在差异。然而,发现VFNs的非医学治疗在改善嗓音质量、减小VFNs大小和消除这些小结方面是成功的。
本评价结果可为VFNs非医学治疗的有效性提供初步证据。然而,需要进行更多具有高证据水平、严格方法学质量和长期随访评估的研究,以便得出更有力的结论。