Suppr超能文献

采用四极与非四极左心室导线行心脏再同步治疗:单部位左心室起搏时程控双心室起搏对生存率和心力衰竭住院的影响。

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Using Quadripolar Versus Non-Quadripolar Left Ventricular Leads Programmed to Biventricular Pacing With Single-Site Left Ventricular Pacing: Impact on Survival and Heart Failure Hospitalization.

机构信息

Aston Medical Research Institute, Aston Medical School, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom

Aston Medical Research Institute, Aston Medical School, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Oct 17;6(10):e007026. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007026.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), quadripolar (QUAD) left ventricular (LV) leads are less prone to postoperative complications than non-QUAD leads. Some studies have suggested better clinical outcomes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Clinical events were assessed in 847 patients after CRT-pacing or CRT-defibrillation using either QUAD (n=287) or non-QUAD (n=560), programmed to single-site site LV pacing. Over a follow-up period of 3.2 years (median [interquartile range, 1.90-5.0]), QUAD was associated with a lower total mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.32, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20-0.52), cardiac mortality (aHR: 0.36, 95% CI, 0.20-0.65), and heart failure (HF) hospitalization (aHR: 0.62, 95% CI, 0.39-0.99), after adjustment for age, sex, New York Heart Association class, HF etiology, device type (CRT-pacing or CRT-defibrillation), comorbidities, atrial rhythm, medication, left ventricular ejection fraction, and creatinine. Death from pump failure was lower with QUAD (aHR: 0.33; 95% CI, 0.18-0.62), but no group differences emerged with respect to sudden cardiac death. There were no differences in implant-related complications. Re-interventions for LV displacement or phrenic nerve stimulation, which were lower with QUAD, predicted total mortality (aHR: 1.68, 95% CI, 1.11-2.54), cardiac mortality (aHR: 2.61, 95% CI, 1.66-4.11) and HF hospitalization (aHR: 2.09, 95% CI, 1.22-3.58).

CONCLUSIONS

CRT using QUAD, programmed to biventricular pacing with single-site LV pacing, is associated with a lower total mortality, cardiac mortality, and HF hospitalization. These trends were observed for both CRT-defibrillation and CRT-pacing, after adjustment for HF cause and other confounders. Re-intervention for LV lead displacement or phrenic nerve stimulation was associated with worse outcomes.

摘要

背景

在心脏再同步治疗(CRT)中,与非四极(QUAD)左心室(LV)导联相比,四极(QUAD)LV 导联术后并发症发生率较低。一些研究表明其具有更好的临床结局。

方法和结果

在使用 QUAD(n=287)或非 QUAD(n=560)的 847 例 CRT 起搏或 CRT 除颤患者中评估临床事件,LV 起搏程控为单部位起搏。在 3.2 年的随访期间(中位数[四分位距,1.90-5.0]),QUAD 与总死亡率降低相关(校正后的危险比[aHR]:0.32,95%置信区间[CI]:0.20-0.52)、心脏死亡率(aHR:0.36,95%CI:0.20-0.65)和心力衰竭(HF)住院率(aHR:0.62,95%CI:0.39-0.99)相关,调整因素包括年龄、性别、纽约心脏协会(NYHA)心功能分级、HF 病因、器械类型(CRT 起搏或 CRT 除颤)、合并症、心房节律、药物治疗、左心室射血分数和血肌酐。QUAD 组泵衰竭死亡率较低(aHR:0.33;95%CI:0.18-0.62),但两组间心源性猝死无差异。LV 移位或膈神经刺激相关并发症无差异。LV 移位或膈神经刺激的再介入治疗较低,预测总死亡率(aHR:1.68,95%CI:1.11-2.54)、心脏死亡率(aHR:2.61,95%CI:1.66-4.11)和 HF 住院率(aHR:2.09,95%CI:1.22-3.58)。

结论

程控为双心室起搏、单部位 LV 起搏的 CRT 使用 QUAD 与总死亡率、心脏死亡率和 HF 住院率降低相关。在调整 HF 病因和其他混杂因素后,观察到 CRT 除颤和起搏均存在这种趋势。LV 导联移位或膈神经刺激的再介入治疗与预后较差相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b3c/5721885/36ad15bdf818/JAH3-6-e007026-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验