Suppr超能文献

越南基层医疗医生在哮喘管理中实施全球哮喘防治创议(GINA)指南。

Implementation of GINA guidelines in asthma management by primary care physicians in Vietnam.

作者信息

Nguyen Vinh Nhu, Nguyen Quynh Nhat, Le An Pham, Chavannes Niels H

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

出版信息

Int J Gen Med. 2017 Oct 5;10:347-355. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S147752. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Asthma control is suboptimal in Vietnam. Lack of knowledge of primary care physicians (PCPs) for asthma management may potentially be one of the causes.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess the knowledge and practice of PCPs' asthma management based on the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines (2015 update).

METHODS

A cross-sectional study with convenience sampling was conducted among PCPs in an urban and rural area of Vietnam using questionnaires related to asthma patients daily practice: use of spirometry and the asthma control test (ACT), prescription of asthma medications, and frequency of consultations. Five asthma case scenarios were also used to ask participants to classify GINA-defined levels of asthma control and to choose the initial or adjusted treatment options based on the current situation. All scenarios are common in Vietnam, ie, three cases for adults, one case for children, and one case for pregnant women.

RESULTS

Of the 327 completed questionnaires, 201 questionnaires could be analyzed. Most PCPs consulted their asthma patients on a weekly to monthly basis. Approximately 50% used spirometry for asthma care and only 25% used ACT. For asthma treatment, oral short-acting beta agonists and oral steroids were still commonly used and long-acting beta agonists alone were prescribed by 70%. Regarding GINA-defined levels of asthma control, 24% of the responders had ≥50% of correct answers, 21% had no correct answers, 2% had all five correct answers, and 20-42% had a correct answer for each of the five questions. Regarding treatment choice, 22% had ≥50% of correct answers, 14% had a wrong answer for all nine questions, and no respondent had a correct answer for ≥8 questions.

CONCLUSION

The percentage of PCPs in Vietnam who had implemented GINA 2015 was low. Some drugs with a high risk of side effects were still being prescribed. There is a need to improve both knowledge and daily practice. Additional studies should determine why these guidelines are not largely adopted by PCPs in Vietnam.

摘要

背景

越南的哮喘控制情况未达最佳水平。基层医疗医生(PCP)对哮喘管理缺乏了解可能是原因之一。

目的

本研究旨在根据全球哮喘防治创议(GINA)指南(2015年更新版)评估基层医疗医生对哮喘管理的知识和实践情况。

方法

采用便利抽样的横断面研究方法,在越南城乡地区的基层医疗医生中进行调查,使用与哮喘患者日常诊疗相关的问卷:肺功能仪的使用和哮喘控制测试(ACT)、哮喘药物处方以及会诊频率。还使用了五个哮喘病例场景,要求参与者对GINA定义的哮喘控制水平进行分类,并根据当前情况选择初始或调整后的治疗方案。所有场景在越南都很常见,即三个成人病例、一个儿童病例和一个孕妇病例。

结果

在327份完成的问卷中,201份问卷可用于分析。大多数基层医疗医生每周至每月会诊一次哮喘患者。约50%的医生在哮喘护理中使用肺功能仪,仅25%的医生使用ACT。对于哮喘治疗,口服短效β受体激动剂和口服类固醇仍被普遍使用,仅70%的医生单独开具长效β受体激动剂。关于GINA定义的哮喘控制水平,24%的应答者有≥50%的正确答案,21%的应答者没有正确答案,2%的应答者五个问题全部答对,20 - 42%的应答者对五个问题中的每个问题都有一个正确答案。关于治疗选择,22%的应答者有≥50%的正确答案,14%的应答者对所有九个问题都回答错误,没有应答者对≥8个问题回答正确。

结论

越南实施GINA 2015的基层医疗医生比例较低。一些副作用风险高的药物仍在被处方。有必要提高知识水平和日常实践能力。进一步的研究应确定为何这些指南在越南未被基层医疗医生广泛采用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c4b/5634369/2e55afb23fbd/ijgm-10-347Fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验