Alvarez Jean Claude, Lasne Laetitia, Etting Isabelle, Chéron Gérard, Abadie Véronique, Fabresse Nicolas, Larabi Islam Amine
Laboratory of Pharmacology-Toxicology, AP-HP, INSERM U-1173, Raymond Poincaré University Hospital, Versailles Saint Quentin-en-Yvelines University, 104 Boulevard Raymond Poincaré, 92380, Garches, France.
Pediatric Emergency Department, Necker-Enfants Malades, Université Paris-Descartes, 149, rue de Sèvres, 7574, Paris Cedex 15, France.
Int J Legal Med. 2018 Jan;132(1):165-172. doi: 10.1007/s00414-017-1720-5. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
There are many differences between the hair from children and that of adult subjects, the hair being thinner, more porous with a different growth rate from the usual 1 cm/month observed in adults. In order to determine whether hair analysis could discriminate between chronic use and acute administration of a drug in children like in adults, we analyzed hair from 18 children aged between 1 day and 15 years in whom the administration of different drugs was known (single therapeutic administration or acute intoxication). A strand of hair was sampled within 1 to 45 days after treatment or intoxication. Analysis was conducted using LC/MS/MS. In the 10 youngest children, aged between 1 day and 29 months, the compounds administered in hospital or responsible for intoxication (lidocaine, ropivacaine, diazepam, midazolam, levetiracetam, morphine, ketamine, methadone, buprenorphine, THC, MDMA) were found in all segments of the hair independently of the time of sampling (1-45 days after ingestion). The concentrations detected were similar along the hair shaft, showing a radial diffusion and incorporation of the analytes in the hair of young children from the sebum. Concentrations could be very high when sampled shortly after administration (72 ng/mg for methadone, 75 ng/mg for MDMA after 3 days) and lower when sampling later (1.2 ng/mg for MDMA after 45 days). In these cases, hair analysis allowed to highlight the compounds responsible for intoxication even when they had disappeared from the blood or urine but should not be used to discriminate long-term exposure to a drug. In the eight remaining children aged from 34 months to 15 years, the drugs used in hospital (lidocaine, diazepam, morphine) or responsible for intoxication (THC, codeine, buprenorphine) were not found in any analyzed segments sampled 1 to 5 days after administration of the drugs, in agreement with the non-incorporation of the drugs from the sebum into the hair. For those children aged over 34 months, hair analysis allows to determine the chronic administration of a drug, like in adults.
儿童头发与成人头发存在许多差异,儿童头发更细,孔隙更多,生长速度也与成人通常观察到的每月1厘米不同。为了确定头发分析是否能像在成人中那样区分儿童对药物的长期使用和急性给药,我们分析了18名年龄在1天至15岁之间已知使用不同药物(单次治疗给药或急性中毒)的儿童的头发。在治疗或中毒后1至45天内采集一缕头发。使用液相色谱/串联质谱法进行分析。在10名年龄最小的儿童(1天至29个月)中,在医院使用的或导致中毒的化合物(利多卡因、罗哌卡因、地西泮、咪达唑仑、左乙拉西坦、吗啡、氯胺酮、美沙酮、丁丙诺啡、四氢大麻酚、摇头丸)在头发的所有段中均被发现,与采样时间(摄入后1至45天)无关。沿发干检测到的浓度相似,表明分析物从皮脂径向扩散并掺入幼儿头发中。给药后不久采样时浓度可能非常高(美沙酮为72纳克/毫克,摇头丸3天后为75纳克/毫克),稍后采样时浓度较低(摇头丸45天后为1.2纳克/毫克)。在这些情况下,头发分析即使在化合物已从血液或尿液中消失时也能突出显示导致中毒的化合物,但不应将其用于区分长期接触药物的情况。在其余8名年龄在34个月至15岁的儿童中,在给药后1至5天采集的任何分析段中均未发现医院使用的药物(利多卡因、地西泮、吗啡)或导致中毒的药物(四氢大麻酚、可待因、丁丙诺啡),这与药物未从皮脂掺入头发一致。对于那些年龄超过34个月的儿童,头发分析可以像在成人中一样确定药物的长期给药情况。