Suppr超能文献

快速镇静:抗精神病药物还是苯二氮䓬类药物?

Rapid tranquilization: antipsychotics or benzodiazepines?

作者信息

Dubin W R

机构信息

Philadelphia Psychiatric Center, PA 19131.

出版信息

J Clin Psychiatry. 1988 Dec;49 Suppl:5-12.

PMID:2904430
Abstract

With the advent of rapid tranquilization (RT), psychiatrists were able to intervene quickly and effectively with psychotic, agitated, and potentially assaultive patients. As RT often obviated the need for physical restraints, it became a mainstay in emergency psychiatry. While studies have repeatedly demonstrated the safety and efficacy of antipsychotic medication to achieve RT, there has been some concern about potential untoward side effects, such as neuroleptic malignant syndrome, tardive dyskinesia, and extrapyramidal symptoms. As a result, many investigators have begun exploring alternatives to the use of antipsychotics for RT. Benzodiazepines are among the classes of drugs most often discussed. The author reviews the current literature on both antipsychotics and benzodiazepines and summarizes the results of several extensive reviews of RT that have appeared in the past few years. The author also critically examines the literature on the use of benzodiazepines for RT, with emphasis on lorazepam and clonazepam. Finally, the author proposes tentative guidelines for RT and directions for future clinical research.

摘要

随着快速镇静(RT)的出现,精神科医生能够迅速有效地干预患有精神病、烦躁不安且有潜在攻击性的患者。由于RT常常无需使用身体约束,它成为了急诊精神病学的支柱。虽然研究反复证明抗精神病药物用于实现RT的安全性和有效性,但人们对潜在的不良副作用,如抗精神病药恶性综合征、迟发性运动障碍和锥体外系症状,存在一些担忧。因此,许多研究人员开始探索替代抗精神病药物用于RT的方法。苯二氮䓬类药物是最常被讨论的药物类别之一。作者回顾了关于抗精神病药物和苯二氮䓬类药物的当前文献,并总结了过去几年出现的几篇关于RT的广泛综述的结果。作者还批判性地审视了关于使用苯二氮䓬类药物进行RT的文献,重点是劳拉西泮和氯硝西泮。最后,作者提出了RT的暂行指南以及未来临床研究的方向。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验