Sheridan Margaret A, McLaughlin Katie A
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
University of Washington, Department of Psychology.
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2016 Aug;10:108-113. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.05.013. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
Poverty and exposure to adversity have been linked with decreased educational success. Various environmental and neurobiological pathways have been proposed for these associations, however, existing models have several clear drawbacks. Here we outline existing models, and propose an alternate model linking exposure to adverse experiences in childhood to education success. Specifically, we propose that measured dimensions of experience (e.g., decreased cognitive enrichment or increased exposure to violence), instead of named exposures (e.g., poverty) impact neurobiology through neurodevelopmental processes of neuroplasticity. Our model results in testable hypotheses and clear intervention strategies. We predict that exposure to trauma will have a distinct neurobiological impact from exposure to a lack of cognitive stimulation and that these distinct exposures will benefit from different interventions. Specificity in this arena is thus likely to better support educational achievement for disadvantaged children.
贫困和身处逆境与教育成就降低有关。针对这些关联,人们提出了各种环境和神经生物学途径,然而,现有模型存在几个明显的缺陷。在此,我们概述现有模型,并提出一个将童年时期接触不良经历与教育成就联系起来的替代模型。具体而言,我们提出,所衡量的经历维度(例如,认知丰富度降低或暴力接触增加),而非特定的接触情况(例如,贫困),通过神经可塑性的神经发育过程影响神经生物学。我们的模型产生了可检验的假设和明确的干预策略。我们预测,接触创伤与接触认知刺激不足会产生不同的神经生物学影响,且这些不同的接触情况将受益于不同的干预措施。因此,该领域的特异性可能会更好地支持弱势儿童的教育成就。