Nicol Andrea L, Hurley Robert W, Benzon Honorio T
From the *Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas; †Department of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; and ‡Department of Anesthesiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Anesth Analg. 2017 Nov;125(5):1682-1703. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002426.
Chronic pain exerts a tremendous burden on individuals and societies. If one views chronic pain as a single disease entity, then it is the most common and costly medical condition. At present, medical professionals who treat patients in chronic pain are recommended to provide comprehensive and multidisciplinary treatments, which may include pharmacotherapy. Many providers use nonopioid medications to treat chronic pain; however, for some patients, opioid analgesics are the exclusive treatment of chronic pain. However, there is currently an epidemic of opioid use in the United States, and recent guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) have recommended that the use of opioids for nonmalignant chronic pain be used only in certain circumstances. The goal of this review was to report the current body of evidence-based medicine gained from prospective, randomized-controlled, blinded studies on the use of nonopioid analgesics for the most common noncancer chronic pain conditions. A total of 9566 studies were obtained during literature searches, and 271 of these met inclusion for this review. Overall, while many nonopioid analgesics have been found to be effective in reducing pain for many chronic pain conditions, it is evident that the number of high-quality studies is lacking, and the effect sizes noted in many studies are not considered to be clinically significant despite statistical significance. More research is needed to determine effective and mechanism-based treatments for the chronic pain syndromes discussed in this review. Utilization of rigorous and homogeneous research methodology would likely allow for better consistency and reproducibility, which is of utmost importance in guiding evidence-based care.
慢性疼痛给个人和社会带来了巨大负担。如果将慢性疼痛视为一种单一的疾病实体,那么它是最常见且成本最高的医疗状况。目前,建议治疗慢性疼痛患者的医学专业人员提供全面的多学科治疗,其中可能包括药物治疗。许多医疗服务提供者使用非阿片类药物治疗慢性疼痛;然而,对于一些患者来说,阿片类镇痛药是慢性疼痛的唯一治疗方法。然而,目前美国存在阿片类药物使用泛滥的情况,疾病控制中心(CDC)最近的指南建议,仅在某些情况下使用阿片类药物治疗非恶性慢性疼痛。本综述的目的是报告从关于使用非阿片类镇痛药治疗最常见的非癌性慢性疼痛状况的前瞻性、随机对照、双盲研究中获得的当前循证医学证据。在文献检索过程中总共获得了9566项研究,其中271项符合本综述的纳入标准。总体而言,虽然已发现许多非阿片类镇痛药对许多慢性疼痛状况有效,但显然高质量研究的数量不足,而且许多研究中记录的效应量尽管具有统计学意义,但在临床上并不被认为具有显著意义。需要更多研究来确定针对本综述中讨论的慢性疼痛综合征的有效且基于机制的治疗方法。采用严谨且统一的研究方法可能会实现更好的一致性和可重复性,这对于指导循证医疗至关重要。