Suppr超能文献

输卵管切除术用于计划生育以预防卵巢癌的成本效益分析

The Cost-Effectiveness of Salpingectomies for Family Planning in the Prevention of Ovarian Cancer.

作者信息

Tai R W Melissa, Choi Stephanie K Y, Coyte Peter C

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON; Michael Garron Hospital, Toronto, ON.

Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018 Mar;40(3):317-327. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.06.038. Epub 2017 Oct 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynaecologic cancer. Disease prevention may be the only method to reduce the incidence of ovarian cancer. The Society of Gynecologic Oncology advised that salpingectomies may be an appropriate and feasible strategy for ovarian cancer risk reduction. This study conducted an economic evaluation from a societal perspective of bilateral salpingectomies versus conventional sterilization techniques in the prevention of ovarian cancer.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a micro-cost analysis comparing laparoscopic tubal coagulation, tubal clips and bilateral salpingectomies at the Michael Garron Hospital, formerly the Toronto East General Hospital, from 2015 to 2016. A Markov model was used in the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses on these surgical procedures in ovarian cancer prevention. Costs were derived for the number ovarian cancer cases observed per sterilization method, cancer treatment, and associated procedural costs over each cancer patient's lifetime. The number of bilateral salpingectomies required to prevent an additional ovarian cancer case with the recommended treatment was also estimated.

RESULTS

Bilateral salpingectomies performed at the Michael Garron Hospital generated savings of $7823 per life-year gained (95% CI $3248-$10 190; incremental cost [ΔC] -$907, incremental effect [ΔE] 0.11 life-years gained) compared with tubal clips and savings of $6315 per life-year gained (95% CI -$6360 to $9342; ΔC -$755, ΔE 0.11 life-years gained) compared with tubal coagulation. Most importantly, for every 150 bilateral salpingectomies performed, one case of ovarian cancer may be prevented.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic bilateral salpingectomy is the dominant, cost-effective surgical strategy when compared to tubal clips and tubal coagulation to prevent ovarian cancer. Laparoscopic bilateral salpingectomies reduce costs and enhance quality-adjusted life-years relative to the two alternative treatments.

摘要

目的

卵巢癌是最致命的妇科癌症。疾病预防可能是降低卵巢癌发病率的唯一方法。妇科肿瘤学会建议,输卵管切除术可能是降低卵巢癌风险的一种合适且可行的策略。本研究从社会角度对双侧输卵管切除术与传统绝育技术在预防卵巢癌方面进行了经济评估。

研究设计

我们于2015年至2016年在迈克尔·加伦医院(前身为多伦多东部总医院)进行了一项微观成本分析,比较了腹腔镜输卵管凝固术、输卵管夹和双侧输卵管切除术。在这些预防卵巢癌的手术程序的成本效益和成本效用分析中使用了马尔可夫模型。成本来源于每种绝育方法观察到的卵巢癌病例数、癌症治疗以及每位癌症患者一生中相关程序的成本。还估计了采用推荐治疗方法预防一例额外卵巢癌病例所需的双侧输卵管切除术数量。

结果

与输卵管夹相比,在迈克尔·加伦医院进行的双侧输卵管切除术每获得一个生命年可节省7823美元(95%可信区间3248美元至10190美元;增量成本[ΔC] -907美元,增量效果[ΔE] 0.11个生命年),与输卵管凝固术相比每获得一个生命年可节省6315美元(95%可信区间-6360美元至9342美元;ΔC -755美元,ΔE 0.11个生命年)。最重要的是,每进行150例双侧输卵管切除术,可能预防一例卵巢癌。

结论

与输卵管夹和输卵管凝固术相比,腹腔镜双侧输卵管切除术是预防卵巢癌的主要、具有成本效益的手术策略。相对于两种替代治疗方法,腹腔镜双侧输卵管切除术降低了成本并提高了质量调整生命年。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验