Department of Psychology, The University of British Columbia.
Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University.
Dev Psychol. 2018 Jan;54(1):1-14. doi: 10.1037/dev0000404. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
Whereas some evidence suggests that toddlers consider targets' deservingness when deciding whom to help, other research demonstrates that toddlers help indiscriminately. The present findings shed light on this discrepancy by demonstrating that although toddlers do exhibit selectivity in giving behaviors, their emotional responses are comparatively indiscriminate. Specifically, in Experiment 1, 20-month-olds (N = 64) were more likely to give preferred toys to prosocial versus antisocial puppets, and more likely to withhold toys from antisocial versus prosocial puppets. Experiment 2 (N = 64) ruled out low-level explanations for the effects observed in Experiment 1, demonstrating that toddlers do not show the same effects when puppets' toy preferences are unclear. Despite providing evidence for selectivity in giving behaviors, across both experiments, toddlers were happier after giving than before giving, regardless of what they gave or whom they gave to. These results reveal the possibility of a divergence in early prosociality: Toddlers' giving behaviors are responsive to recipient deservingness, but their after-the-fact emotional reactions are responsive to giving acts themselves. Results are discussed in terms of their relevance to the debate regarding whether toddlers' early prosocial behaviors are discriminate versus indiscriminate. (PsycINFO Database Record
虽然有一些证据表明,幼儿在决定帮助谁时会考虑目标的应得性,但其他研究表明,幼儿会不分青红皂白地提供帮助。本研究通过证明尽管幼儿在给予行为中确实表现出选择性,但他们的情绪反应相对没有区别,从而阐明了这一差异。具体来说,在实验 1 中,20 个月大的儿童(N=64)更有可能将喜欢的玩具给予亲社会的木偶,而不是反社会的木偶,也更有可能将玩具 withholding 反社会的木偶而不是亲社会的木偶。实验 2(N=64)排除了实验 1 中观察到的效应的低水平解释,表明当木偶对玩具的偏好不明确时,幼儿不会表现出相同的效应。尽管在这两项实验中都提供了给予行为具有选择性的证据,但无论幼儿给予什么或给予谁,给予后他们都会比给予前更快乐。这些结果揭示了早期亲社会行为可能存在分歧的可能性:幼儿的给予行为对接受者的应得性有反应,但他们事后的情绪反应对给予行为本身有反应。研究结果从是否认为幼儿早期亲社会行为是有区别的还是无区别的角度进行了讨论。