Suppr超能文献

老年髋部骨折手术患者区域麻醉与全身麻醉对术后谵妄影响的比较(RAGA-谵妄研究):一项多中心随机对照试验的研究方案

Comparison of regional with general anaesthesia on postoperative delirium (RAGA-delirium) in the older patients undergoing hip fracture surgery: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Li Ting, Yeung Joyce, Li Jun, Zhang Yan, Melody Teresa, Gao Ye, Wang Yi, Lian Qianquan, Gao Fang

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Perioperative, Critical Care and Trauma Trials Group, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 22;7(10):e016937. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016937.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Postoperative delirium (POD) is a common serious postoperative complication especially in older people and is associated with increased mortality, morbidity and healthcare costs. There is no clear consensus which anaesthesia is associated with less incidence of POD for older patients. We aim to assess whether regional anaesthesia results in lower incidence of POD comparing with general anaesthesia (GA) among older patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

RAGA-delirium is a pragmatic, multicentre, prospective, parallel grouped, randomised controlled clinical trial comparing RA or GA for hip fracture surgery. A total of 1000 patients who are 65 years or over and who are having planned hip fracture surgery in nine clinical trial centres of China will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either anaesthesia for the surgery. The primary endpoint will be the incidence of POD at day 7. The secondary endpoints will be the subtype, severity and duration of delirium, postoperative acute pain score, incidence of other postoperative non-delirium complications, quality of life and cost-effective outcomes. Randomisation will be performed at the patient level using computer-generated assignment. Outcome assessors will be blinded from intervention assignment. Assessments will be conducted before surgery, intraoperatively, postoperatively, during the hospital stay, at 30-day, 6-month and 1-year postoperative intervals.

POTENTIAL IMPACT OF STUDY

This study will provide clinical evidence with a more robust methodology to help anaesthetists in selecting appropriate anaesthesia for older patients with high risk for POD. At the era of increasing emphasis on delirium prevention, this trial has the potential to inform the future national guideline to reduce POD.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approved by the local institutional review board. Trial results will be presented at national and international academic conferences, and published in peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02213380); pre-results.

摘要

引言

术后谵妄(POD)是一种常见的严重术后并发症,尤其在老年人中更为常见,并且与死亡率增加、发病率上升以及医疗费用增加相关。对于老年患者,哪种麻醉方式与较低的POD发生率相关,目前尚无明确共识。我们旨在评估在接受髋部骨折手术的老年患者中,与全身麻醉(GA)相比,区域麻醉是否会导致较低的POD发生率。

方法与分析

RAGA-谵妄研究是一项务实的、多中心、前瞻性、平行分组、随机对照临床试验,比较髋部骨折手术采用区域麻醉(RA)或全身麻醉(GA)的效果。在中国九个临床试验中心,共有1000名65岁及以上且计划接受髋部骨折手术的患者将按1:1比例随机分组,接受手术麻醉。主要终点将是术后第7天的POD发生率。次要终点将包括谵妄的亚型、严重程度和持续时间、术后急性疼痛评分、其他术后非谵妄并发症的发生率、生活质量和成本效益结果。随机分组将在患者层面使用计算机生成的分配方案进行。结果评估者将对干预分配情况保持盲态。评估将在手术前、术中、术后、住院期间、术后30天、6个月和1年进行。

研究的潜在影响

本研究将提供更有力方法的临床证据,以帮助麻醉医生为发生POD高风险的老年患者选择合适的麻醉方式。在日益强调预防谵妄的时代,该试验有可能为未来国家降低POD的指南提供依据。

伦理与传播

经当地机构审查委员会伦理批准。试验结果将在国内和国际学术会议上展示,并发表在同行评审期刊上。

试验注册号

ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT02213380);预结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1aa/5665328/5e637ab275bd/bmjopen-2017-016937f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验