Ocloo Josephine, Garfield Sarah, Dawson Shoba, Dean Franklin Bryony
Health Service and Population Research Department, CIS, CLAHRC, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, London, UK.
Centre for Medication Safety and Service Quality, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 24;7(10):e018426. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018426.
The emergence of patient and public involvement (PPI) in healthcare in the UK can be traced as far back as the 1970s. More recently, campaigns by harmed patients and their relatives have emerged as a result of clinical failings in the NHS, challenging paternalistic healthcare, which have led to a new focus on PPI in quality and safety, nationally and internationally. Evidence suggests that PPI within patient safety is often atheoretical and located within a biomedical discourse. This review will explore the literature on PPI across patient safety, healthcare and social care to identify theory, barriers and enablers that can be used to develop PPI in patient safety.
Systematic searches of three electronic bibliographic databases will be conducted, using both MeSH and free-text terms to identify empirical literature published from database inception to May 2017. The screening process will involve input from at least two researchers and any disagreement will be resolved through discussion with a third reviewer. Initial inclusion and exclusion criteria have been developed and will be refined iteratively throughout the process. Data extraction from included articles will be conducted by at least two researchers using a data extraction form. Extracted information will be analysed using a narrative review approach, which synthesises data using a descriptive method.
No ethical approval is required for this review as no empirical data were collected. We believe that the findings and recommendations from this review will be particularly relevant for an audience of academics and policymakers. The findings will, therefore, be written up and disseminated in international peer-reviewed journals and academic conferences with a health focus. They will also be disseminated to leading health policy organisations in the NHS, such as NHS England and NHS Improvement and national policy bodies such as the Health Foundation.
英国医疗保健领域患者及公众参与(PPI)的出现可追溯至20世纪70年代。最近,由于国民医疗服务体系(NHS)的临床失误,受伤害患者及其亲属发起了一系列运动,对家长式医疗保健提出挑战,这导致在国家和国际层面上,质量与安全方面对PPI有了新的关注。有证据表明,患者安全领域的PPI往往缺乏理论依据,且处于生物医学话语范畴内。本综述将探讨患者安全、医疗保健和社会护理领域中有关PPI的文献,以确定可用于发展患者安全领域PPI的理论、障碍和促进因素。
将对三个电子文献数据库进行系统检索,使用医学主题词(MeSH)和自由文本词来识别从数据库建立至2017年5月发表的实证文献。筛选过程将至少有两名研究人员参与,如有分歧将通过与第三名评审员讨论解决。已制定初步的纳入和排除标准,并将在整个过程中反复完善。纳入文章的数据提取将由至少两名研究人员使用数据提取表进行。提取的信息将采用叙述性综述方法进行分析,该方法使用描述性方法综合数据。
由于未收集实证数据,本综述无需伦理批准。我们认为,本综述的结果和建议将对学术界和政策制定者特别有意义。因此,研究结果将整理并发表在以健康为重点的国际同行评审期刊和学术会议上。它们还将传播给NHS的主要卫生政策组织,如英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS England)和NHS改进机构,以及国家政策机构,如健康基金会。