Jehan Faisal, O'Keeffe Terence, Khan Muhammad, Chi Albert, Tang Andrew, Kulvatunyou Narong, Gries Lynn, Joseph Bellal
Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
Division of Trauma, Critical Care & Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
J Surg Res. 2017 Nov;219:360-365. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.06.049. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
Early initiation of thromboprophylaxis is highly desired in pelvic fracture patients, but it is often delayed due to the fear of hemorrhage. Aim of our study was to assess the safety of early initiation of venous thromboprophylaxis in patients with pelvic trauma managed nonoperatively.
Three-year (2010-2012) retrospective study of trauma patients with pelvic fractures who were managed nonoperatively and received thromboprophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). Patients were stratified in two groups based on the timing of initiation of prophylaxis; early (initiation within first 24 h) and late (after 24 h). Primary outcome measures included decrease in hemoglobin (Hb) levels, number of packed red blood cell (pRBC) units transfused, and the need for hemorrhage control (operative or angioembolization) after initiation of prophylaxis. Regression analysis was performed.
255 patients were included (158 in early and 97 in late group). Mean ± standard deviation age was 48.2 ± 23.3 y, and 50.6% were male. After adjusting for confounders, there was no difference between the two groups in the decrease in Hb levels (b = 0.087, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.253 to 1.025; P = 0.23) or pRBC units transfused (b = -0.005, 95% CI = -0.366 to 0.364; P = 0.75).One patient required hemorrhage control postprophylaxis and belonged to the late group. Subanalysis of patients with signs of bleeding (n = 52) showed no difference between the two groups in the decrease in Hb levels or pRBC units transfused. Patients who received LMWH after 24 h had a higher incidence of symptomatic deep venous thrombosis and a longer hospital length of stay.
Early initiation of thromboprophylaxis with LMWH in patients with pelvic fractures managed nonoperatively is safe and decreases the risk of symptomatic deep venous thrombosis.
骨盆骨折患者非常希望尽早开始血栓预防,但由于担心出血,往往会延迟。我们研究的目的是评估在非手术治疗的骨盆创伤患者中尽早开始静脉血栓预防的安全性。
对2010年至2012年三年间非手术治疗且接受低分子肝素(LMWH)血栓预防的骨盆骨折创伤患者进行回顾性研究。根据预防开始时间将患者分为两组;早期(在最初24小时内开始)和晚期(24小时后)。主要结局指标包括预防开始后血红蛋白(Hb)水平的下降、输注的红细胞浓缩液(pRBC)单位数量以及出血控制(手术或血管栓塞)的需求。进行了回归分析。
纳入255例患者(早期组158例,晚期组97例)。平均±标准差年龄为48.2±23.3岁,男性占50.6%。在调整混杂因素后,两组在Hb水平下降(b = 0.087,95%置信区间[CI] = -0.253至1.025;P = 0.23)或输注的pRBC单位数量(b = -0.005,95%CI = -0.366至0.364;P = 0.75)方面无差异。1例患者在预防后需要进行出血控制,属于晚期组。对有出血迹象的患者(n = 52)进行的亚组分析显示,两组在Hb水平下降或输注的pRBC单位数量方面无差异。24小时后接受LMWH的患者有症状的深静脉血栓形成发生率更高,住院时间更长。
在非手术治疗的骨盆骨折患者中尽早开始使用LMWH进行血栓预防是安全的,并可降低有症状的深静脉血栓形成的风险。