Copeland Vanessa, McLaughlin Milena, Trifilio Steven
Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA.
Department of Pharmacy Practice, Midwestern University Chicago College of Pharmacy, Downers Grove, IL, USA.
Clin Transplant. 2018 Jan;32(1). doi: 10.1111/ctr.13145. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
The objective of the current retrospective study was to compare differences in rate of breakthrough infections for ciprofloxacin vs levofloxacin prophylaxis in autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplant (HSCT) patients treated for multiple myeloma. This was a retrospective, cohort study comparing autologous HSCT recipients treated for multiple myeloma who received ciprofloxacin prophylaxis vs levofloxacin prophylaxis. A total of 297 patients, 143 levofloxacin- and 154 ciprofloxacin-treated were included. There was a significantly higher incidence of bloodstream infections in the ciprofloxacin group (24/154) compared to the levofloxacin group (10/143), P = .03, primarily caused by a statistically higher incidence of gram-positive bloodstream infections (ciprofloxacin [21/154] vs levofloxacin [8/143]; P < .01). Clinically relevant differences exist between fluoroquinolone agents used for prophylaxis. Levofloxacin prophylaxis was more effective than ciprofloxacin prophylaxis to reduce the incidence of bloodstream infections in this study.
本项回顾性研究的目的是比较环丙沙星与左氧氟沙星预防多发性骨髓瘤自体造血干细胞移植(HSCT)患者突破性感染发生率的差异。这是一项回顾性队列研究,比较接受环丙沙星预防和左氧氟沙星预防的多发性骨髓瘤自体HSCT受者。共纳入297例患者,其中143例接受左氧氟沙星治疗,154例接受环丙沙星治疗。与左氧氟沙星组(10/143)相比,环丙沙星组(24/154)的血流感染发生率显著更高,P = 0.03,主要原因是革兰氏阳性血流感染的发生率在统计学上更高(环丙沙星[21/154] vs左氧氟沙星[8/143];P < 0.01)。用于预防的氟喹诺酮类药物之间存在临床相关差异。在本研究中,左氧氟沙星预防比环丙沙星预防更有效地降低了血流感染的发生率。