Sánchez-Moyano J E, García-Asencio I, Donázar-Aramendía I, Miró J M, Megina C, García-Gómez J C
Laboratorio Biología Marina, Dpto. Zoología, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Sevilla, Avd. Reina Mercedes 6, 41012 Sevilla, Spain.
Laboratorio Biología Marina, Dpto. Zoología, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Sevilla, Avd. Reina Mercedes 6, 41012 Sevilla, Spain.
Mar Environ Res. 2017 Dec;132:41-50. doi: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2017.10.014. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
The new biotic index BENFES (Benthic Families Ecological Status Index) for assessing the ecological status of soft-bottom communities based on presence/absence at the taxonomic family level, is described. BENFES was primarily developed for the communities from the Guadalquivir estuary (South-western Spain), but the aim of the present work was to evaluate the reliability and validity of this index for its application in the Water Framework Directive (WFD), especially as a preliminary and rapid assessment method for monitoring the ecological status of transitional and coastal waters. BENFES was compared with five widely used indices (BOPA, BO2A, BENTIX; AMBI and M-AMBI) in several studies from Southwestern Spain. In addition, we have also established comparisons between these indices and the most commonly used Shannon-Wiener diversity. M-AMBI and BENFES showed the best agreement in ecological status assignation and were the most useful and discriminant between the studied areas. BENTIX was a good discriminant in coastal areas but was severe with the environmental condition from estuaries; BOPA/BO2A did not show clear trends in most of the zones; and AMBI tended to provide overestimations of the ecological status. In conclusion, BENFES shows several advantages such as lower taxonomic resolution, greater reliability and only requiring presence/absence. All this implies a huge possibility to perform a simplified monitoring routine for the control of the ecological quality of water bodies.
本文描述了一种新的生物指数BENFES(底栖动物科生态状况指数),该指数基于分类科级别的存在/缺失情况来评估软底群落的生态状况。BENFES最初是为瓜达尔基维尔河河口(西班牙西南部)的群落开发的,但本研究的目的是评估该指数在《水框架指令》(WFD)中的应用可靠性和有效性,特别是作为监测过渡水域和沿海水域生态状况的初步快速评估方法。在西班牙西南部的多项研究中,将BENFES与五个广泛使用的指数(BOPA、BO2A、BENTIX、AMBI和M - AMBI)进行了比较。此外,我们还在这些指数与最常用的香农 - 维纳多样性之间进行了比较。M - AMBI和BENFES在生态状况分类方面表现出最佳一致性,并且在研究区域之间是最有用和最具区分性的。BENTIX在沿海地区是一个很好的区分指标,但对河口的环境条件较为严格;BOPA/BO2A在大多数区域没有显示出明显趋势;而AMBI往往会高估生态状况。总之,BENFES具有几个优点,如分类分辨率较低、可靠性更高且仅需存在/缺失信息。所有这些都意味着有很大的可能性执行简化的监测程序来控制水体的生态质量。