Chacko Karen M, Halvorsen Andrew J, Swenson Sara L, Wahi-Gururaj Sandhya, Steinmann Alwin F, Call Stephanie, Myers Jennifer S, Vidyarthi Arpana, Arora Vineet M
1 University of Colorado, Aurora, CO.
2 Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Am J Med Qual. 2018 Jul;33(4):405-412. doi: 10.1177/1062860617739119. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
Alignment between institutions and graduate medical education (GME) regarding quality and safety initiatives (QI) has not been measured. The objective was to determine US internal medicine residency program directors' (IM PDs) perceived resourcing for QI and alignment between GME and their institutions. A national survey of IM PDs was conducted in the Fall of 2013. Multivariable linear regression was used to test association between a novel Integration Score (IS) measuring alignment between GME and the institution via PD perceptions. The response rate was 72.6% (265/365). According to PDs, residents were highly engaged in QI (82%), but adequate funding (14%) and support personnel (37% to 61%) were lower. Higher IS correlated to reports of funding for QI (76.3% vs 54.5%, P = .012), QI personnel (67.3% vs 41.1%, P < .001), research experts (70.5% vs 50.0%, P < .001), and computer experts (69.0% vs 45.8%, P < .001) for QI assistance. Apparent mismatch between GME and institutional resources exists, and the IS may be useful in measuring GME-institutional leadership alignment in QI.
机构与毕业后医学教育(GME)在质量与安全举措(QI)方面的一致性尚未得到衡量。目的是确定美国内科住院医师培训项目主任(IM PDs)对QI资源的感知以及GME与其所在机构之间的一致性。2013年秋季对IM PDs进行了一项全国性调查。采用多变量线性回归来检验一种新的整合得分(IS)之间的关联,该得分通过项目主任的感知来衡量GME与机构之间的一致性。回复率为72.6%(265/365)。根据项目主任的说法,住院医师高度参与QI(82%),但充足的资金(14%)和支持人员(37%至61%)比例较低。较高的IS与QI资金报告(76.3%对54.5%,P = 0.012)、QI人员(67.3%对41.1%,P < 0.001)、研究专家(70.5%对50.0%,P < 0.001)以及计算机专家(69.0%对45.8%,P < 0.001)提供QI协助的报告相关。GME与机构资源之间存在明显不匹配,IS可能有助于衡量GME与机构在QI方面的领导力一致性。