Christens Brian D, Inzeo Paula Tran, Meinen Amy, Hilgendorf Amy E, Berns Ryan, Korth Amy, Pollard Ethen, McCall Ann, Adams Alexandra, Stedman John
WMJ. 2016 Nov;115(5):259-63.
At the population level, turning the tide on obesity requires not only health education and promotion programs, but also systemic changes in our society. However, few of these changes can be implemented by single agencies or organizations acting in isolation. Broader community-driven efforts are needed to advance and maintain systematic changes across multiple settings. We introduce 2 promising approaches for local action to achieve changes: coalition action and community organizing. Understanding differences between the two approaches makes it clear that while each has distinct advantages, there are also possibilities for synergies between them. We also clarify how community-driven efforts can be catalyzed and supported, and describe our efforts as part of the Wisconsin Obesity Prevention Initiative to identify and implement best practices for building and sustaining the necessary local community capacity to carry out systematic changes. We are working with communities to launch initiatives in which residents are engaged through grassroots organizing, and local agencies, businesses, and other institutions are engaged in pursuit of collective impact on obesity prevention. This will allow us not only to compare the effectiveness of the 2 types of initiatives for driving local changes, but also to explore the potential for the two to work together in pursuit of systemic changes for preventing obesity.
在人群层面,扭转肥胖流行趋势不仅需要健康教育和促进项目,还需要我们社会的系统性变革。然而,这些变革很少能由单个孤立行动的机构或组织来实施。需要更广泛的社区驱动努力来推动和维持多个环境中的系统性变革。我们介绍两种有望实现变革的地方行动方法:联合行动和社区组织。了解这两种方法之间的差异可以清楚地看出,虽然每种方法都有独特的优势,但它们之间也存在协同增效的可能性。我们还阐明了如何催化和支持社区驱动的努力,并描述了我们作为威斯康星州肥胖预防倡议的一部分所做的努力,以确定和实施最佳实践,建设和维持开展系统性变革所需的当地社区能力。我们正在与社区合作开展倡议,通过基层组织让居民参与进来,让当地机构、企业和其他机构共同努力对肥胖预防产生集体影响。这将使我们不仅能够比较这两种推动地方变革的倡议的有效性,还能够探索两者共同努力实现预防肥胖的系统性变革的潜力。