School of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Hwy, Crawley, Perth, WA, 6009, Australia; CSIRO Land and Water, Private Bag 5, Wembley, Perth, WA, 6913, Australia.
CSIRO Land and Water, Private Bag 5, Wembley, Perth, WA, 6913, Australia; School of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Hwy, Crawley, Perth, WA, 6009, Australia.
J Environ Manage. 2018 Jan 15;206:446-457. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.10.036. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
The extent of roads and other forms of linear infrastructure is burgeoning worldwide, but their impacts are inadequately understood and thus poorly mitigated. Previous studies have identified many potential impacts, including alterations to the hydrological functions and soil processes upon which ecosystems depend. However, these impacts have seldom been quantified at a regional level, particularly in arid and semi-arid systems where the gap in knowledge is the greatest, and impacts potentially the most severe. To explore the effects of extensive track, road, and rail networks on surface hydrology at a regional level we assessed over 1000 km of linear infrastructure, including approx. 300 locations where ephemeral streams crossed linear infrastructure, in the largely intact landscapes of Australia's Great Western Woodlands. We found a high level of association between linear infrastructure and altered surface hydrology, with erosion and pooling 5 and 6 times as likely to occur on-road than off-road on average (1.06 erosional and 0.69 pooling features km on vehicle tracks, compared with 0.22 and 0.12 km, off-road, respectively). Erosion severity was greater in the presence of tracks, and 98% of crossings of ephemeral streamlines showed some evidence of impact on water movement (flow impedance (62%); diversion of flows (73%); flow concentration (76%); and/or channel initiation (31%)). Infrastructure type, pastoral land use, culvert presence, soil clay content and erodibility, mean annual rainfall, rainfall erosivity, topography and bare soil cover influenced the frequency and severity of these impacts. We conclude that linear infrastructure frequently affects ephemeral stream flows and intercepts natural overland and near-surface flows, artificially changing site-scale moisture regimes, with some parts of the landscape becoming abnormally wet and other parts becoming water-starved. In addition, linear infrastructure frequently triggers or exacerbates erosion, leading to soil loss and degradation. Where linear infrastructure densities are high, their impacts on ecological processes are likely to be considerable. Linear infrastructure is widespread across much of this relatively intact region, but there remain areas with very low infrastructure densities that need to be protected from further impacts. There is substantial scope for mitigating the impacts of existing and planned infrastructure developments.
道路和其他形式的线性基础设施的范围在全球范围内迅速扩大,但它们的影响尚未得到充分理解,因此也未能得到有效缓解。先前的研究已经确定了许多潜在影响,包括对生态系统赖以生存的水文功能和土壤过程的改变。然而,这些影响很少在区域层面上进行量化,特别是在干旱和半干旱系统中,这些系统的知识差距最大,潜在影响也最严重。为了探索广泛的轨道、道路和铁路网络对区域水平地表水文的影响,我们评估了澳大利亚大西部林地的 1000 多公里线性基础设施,包括大约 300 个临时溪流穿过线性基础设施的地点。我们发现线性基础设施与改变地表水文之间存在高度关联,道路上的侵蚀和积水发生的可能性比道路外高出 5 至 6 倍(车辆轨道上的 1.06 个侵蚀特征和 0.69 个积水特征公里,相比之下,分别为 0.22 和 0.12 公里,道路外)。有轨道的地方侵蚀程度更大,98%的临时溪流线交叉点都显示出对水流运动有影响的证据(水流阻抗 62%;水流分流 73%;水流集中 76%;以及/或渠道启动 31%)。基础设施类型、牧场利用、涵洞存在、土壤粘粒含量和可蚀性、年平均降雨量、降雨侵蚀力、地形和裸土覆盖影响了这些影响的频率和严重程度。我们的结论是,线性基础设施经常影响临时溪流的流量,并拦截自然的漫流和近地表水流,人为地改变了场地尺度的水分状况,景观的某些部分变得异常潮湿,而其他部分则变得缺水。此外,线性基础设施经常引发或加剧侵蚀,导致土壤流失和退化。在线性基础设施密度较高的地方,它们对生态过程的影响可能相当大。线性基础设施在这个相对完整的区域内广泛分布,但仍有一些基础设施密度非常低的地区需要保护免受进一步的影响。现有的和计划中的基础设施开发的影响有很大的缓解空间。