Suppr超能文献

《驾驶愤怒量表在中国职业驾驶员中的信效度研究》

[Reliability and validity of Driving Anger Scale in professional drivers in China].

作者信息

Li Z, Yang Y M, Zhang C, Li Y, Hu J, Gao L W, Zhou Y X, Zhang X J

机构信息

School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China.

Yixing County Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Yixing 214200, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2017 Nov 10;38(11):1476-1479. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2017.11.007.

Abstract

To assess the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Driving Anger Scale (DAS) in professional drivers in China and provide a scientific basis for the application of the scale in drivers in China. Professional drivers, including taxi drivers, bus drivers, truck drivers and school bus drivers, were selected to complete the questionnaire. Cronbach's and split-half reliability were calculated to evaluate the reliability of DAS, and content, contract, discriminant and convergent validity were performed to measure the validity of the scale. The overall Cronbach's of DAS was 0.934 and the split-half reliability was 0.874. The correlation coefficient of each subscale with the total scale was 0.639-0.922. The simplified version of DAS supported a presupposed six-factor structure, explaining 56.371% of the total variance revealed by exploratory factor analysis. The DAS had good convergent and discriminant validity, with the success rate of calibration experiment of 100%. DAS has a good reliability and validity in professional drivers in China, and the use of DAS is worth promoting in divers.

摘要

评估中文版驾驶愤怒量表(DAS)在中国职业驾驶员中的信效度,为该量表在中国驾驶员中的应用提供科学依据。选取包括出租车司机、公交车司机、卡车司机和校车司机在内的职业驾驶员完成问卷调查。计算克朗巴哈系数和分半信度以评估DAS的信度,并进行内容效度、效标效度、区分效度和聚合效度分析以衡量该量表的效度。DAS的总体克朗巴哈系数为0.934,分半信度为0.874。各分量表与总量表的相关系数为0.639 - 0.922。DAS简化版支持预设的六因素结构,在探索性因素分析中解释了总方差的56.371%。DAS具有良好的聚合效度和区分效度,校准实验成功率为100%。DAS在中国职业驾驶员中具有良好的信效度,值得在驾驶员中推广使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验