Department of Women, Children and Family Health Science, College of Nursing, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
School of Nursing, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Nov 8;17(Suppl 2):336. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1493-3.
The links between empowerment and a number of health-related outcomes in sub-Saharan Africa have been documented, but empowerment related to pregnancy is under-investigated. Antenatal care (ANC) is the entry point into the healthcare system for most women, so it is important to understand how ANC affects aspects of women's sense of control over their pregnancy. We compare pregnancy-related empowerment for women randomly assigned to the standard of care versus CenteringPregnancy-based group ANC (intervention) in two sub-Saharan countries, Malawi and Tanzania.
Pregnant women in Malawi (n = 112) and Tanzania (n = 110) were recruited into a pilot study and randomized to individual ANC or group ANC. Retention at late pregnancy was 81% in Malawi and 95% in Tanzania. In both countries, individual ANC, termed focused antenatal care (FANC), is the standard of care. FANC recommends four ANC visits plus a 6-week post-birth visit and is implemented following the country's standard of care. In group ANC, each contact included self- and midwife-assessments in group space and 90 minutes of interactive health promotion. The number of contacts was the same for both study conditions. We measured pregnancy-related empowerment in late pregnancy using the Pregnancy-Related Empowerment Scale (PRES). Independent samples t-tests and multiple linear regressions were employed to assess whether group ANC led to higher PRES scores than individual ANC and to investigate other sociodemographic factors related to pregnancy-related empowerment.
In Malawi, women in group ANC had higher PRES scores than those in individual ANC. Type of care was a significant predictor of PRES and explained 67% of the variation. This was not so in Tanzania; PRES scores were similar for both types of care. Predictive models including sociodemographic variables showed religion as a potential moderator of treatment effect in Tanzania. Muslim women in group ANC had a higher mean PRES score than those in individual ANC; a difference not observed among Christian women.
Group ANC empowers pregnant women in some contexts. More research is needed to identify the ways that models of ANC can affect pregnancy-related empowerment in addition to perinatal outcomes globally.
在撒哈拉以南非洲,赋权与许多健康相关结果之间的联系已经得到证实,但与怀孕相关的赋权问题研究不足。产前护理 (ANC) 是大多数女性进入医疗保健系统的切入点,因此了解 ANC 如何影响女性对怀孕的控制感的各个方面非常重要。我们比较了在马拉维和坦桑尼亚这两个撒哈拉以南国家中,随机分配到标准护理组和基于 CenteringPregnancy 的小组 ANC(干预组)的孕妇的与怀孕相关的赋权情况。
马拉维和坦桑尼亚的孕妇(n=112 和 n=110)被招募到一项试点研究中,并随机分配到个体 ANC 或小组 ANC。马拉维的晚期妊娠保留率为 81%,坦桑尼亚为 95%。在这两个国家,个体 ANC,称为重点产前护理 (FANC),是标准护理。FANC 建议进行四次 ANC 就诊和 6 周产后就诊,并按照该国的标准护理实施。在小组 ANC 中,每次就诊都包括小组空间中的自我和助产士评估以及 90 分钟的互动式健康促进。两种研究条件的就诊次数相同。我们在晚期妊娠时使用与怀孕相关的赋权量表 (PRES) 测量与怀孕相关的赋权情况。采用独立样本 t 检验和多元线性回归评估小组 ANC 是否比个体 ANC 导致更高的 PRES 评分,并探讨与与怀孕相关的赋权相关的其他社会人口学因素。
在马拉维,小组 ANC 中的女性的 PRES 评分高于个体 ANC 中的女性。护理类型是 PRES 的显著预测因子,解释了 67%的变异。在坦桑尼亚则并非如此;两种护理类型的 PRES 评分相似。包括社会人口学变量的预测模型表明,在坦桑尼亚,宗教是治疗效果的潜在调节因素。在小组 ANC 中的穆斯林女性的 PRES 评分高于个体 ANC 中的穆斯林女性;而基督教女性则没有这种差异。
在某些情况下,小组 ANC 使孕妇赋权。需要更多的研究来确定 ANC 模式除了全球围产期结果之外,还可以以何种方式影响与怀孕相关的赋权。