Pechorro Pedro, Ayala-Nunes Lara, Kahn Rachel, Nunes Cristina
School of Psychology, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057, Braga, Portugal.
Department of Developmental and Educational Psychology, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2018 Aug;49(4):523-533. doi: 10.1007/s10578-017-0772-6.
Aggression is an important risk factor for various forms of problem behaviors in adolescence, and research has often distinguished between reactive and proactive forms of aggression. The aim of the present study was to compare the psychometric properties (i.e., structural invariance, internal consistency, and criterion validity) of the Reactive-Proactive Aggression Questionnaire (RPQ) between males and females among a mixed-gender school sample of 782 Portuguese youth (M = 15.87 years, SD = 1.72). Confirmatory factor analysis revealed that a two-factor first-order structure obtained the best fit and cross-gender measurement invariance was demonstrated after excluding item 21. The Portuguese version of the RPQ demonstrated generally adequate psychometric properties of internal consistency measured by Cronbach's alpha and omega coefficient, convergent validity, discriminant validity, criterion-related validity, and known-groups validity. Findings are discussed in terms of the use of the RPQ with male and female youths.
攻击行为是青少年各种问题行为的重要风险因素,并且研究常常区分反应性攻击和主动性攻击。本研究的目的是在782名葡萄牙青少年(平均年龄M = 15.87岁,标准差SD = 1.72)的混合性别学校样本中,比较男性和女性之间反应性-主动性攻击问卷(RPQ)的心理测量学特性(即结构不变性、内部一致性和效标效度)。验证性因素分析表明,一个双因素一阶结构拟合最佳,在排除第21项后证明了跨性别测量不变性。RPQ的葡萄牙语版本在通过克朗巴哈α系数和ω系数测量的内部一致性、收敛效度、区分效度、效标关联效度和已知群体效度方面总体表现出足够的心理测量学特性。根据RPQ在男性和女性青少年中的使用情况对研究结果进行了讨论。