• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国 DCD 风险评分:一种定义脑死亡后捐献肝脏移植中无效性的新提案。

The UK DCD Risk Score: A new proposal to define futility in donation-after-circulatory-death liver transplantation.

机构信息

The Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Swiss HPB Centre, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Hepatol. 2018 Mar;68(3):456-464. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.10.034. Epub 2017 Nov 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhep.2017.10.034
PMID:29155020
Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Primary non-function and ischaemic cholangiopathy are the most feared complications following donation-after-circulatory-death (DCD) liver transplantation. The aim of this study was to design a new score on risk assessment in liver-transplantation DCD based on donor-and-recipient parameters.

METHODS

Using the UK national DCD database, a risk analysis was performed in adult recipients of DCD liver grafts in the UK between 2000 and 2015 (n = 1,153). A new risk score was calculated (UK DCD Risk Score) on the basis of a regression analysis. This is validated using the United Network for Organ Sharing database (n = 1,617) and our own DCD liver-transplant database (n = 315). Finally, the new score was compared with two other available prediction systems: the DCD risk scores from the University of California, Los Angeles and King's College Hospital, London.

RESULTS

The following seven strongest predictors of DCD graft survival were identified: functional donor warm ischaemia, cold ischaemia, recipient model for end-stage liver disease, recipient age, donor age, previous orthotopic liver transplantation, and donor body mass index. A combination of these risk factors (UK DCD risk model) stratified the best recipients in terms of graft survival in the entire UK DCD database, as well as in the United Network for Organ Sharing and in our own DCD population. Importantly, the UK DCD Risk Score significantly predicted graft loss caused by primary non-function or ischaemic cholangiopathy in the futile group (>10 score points). The new prediction model demonstrated a better C statistic of 0.79 compared to the two other available systems (0.71 and 0.64, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The UK DCD Risk Score is a reliable tool to detect high-risk and futile combinations of donor-and-recipient factors in DCD liver transplantation. It is simple to use and offers a great potential for making better decisions on which DCD graft should be rejected or may benefit from functional assessment and further optimization by machine perfusion.

LAY SUMMARY

In this study, we provide a new prediction model for graft loss in donation-after-circulatory-death (DCD) liver transplantation. Based on UK national data, the new UK DCD Risk Score involves the following seven clinically relevant risk factors: donor age, donor body mass index, functional donor warm ischaemia, cold storage, recipient age, recipient laboratory model for end-stage liver disease, and retransplantation. Three risk classes were defined: low risk (0-5 points), high risk (6-10 points), and futile (>10 points). This new model stratified best in terms of graft survival compared to other available models. Futile combinations (>10 points) achieved an only very limited 1- and 5-year graft survival of 37% and less than 20%, respectively. In contrast, an excellent graft survival has been shown in low-risk combinations (≤5 points). The new model is easy to calculate at the time of liver acceptance. It may help to decide which risk combination will benefit from additional graft treatment, or which DCD liver should be declined for a certain recipient.

摘要

背景与目的

在接受心跳停止后捐献(DCD)肝移植后,原发性无功能和缺血性胆管炎是最令人担忧的并发症。本研究旨在基于供体和受者参数设计一种新的 DCD 肝移植风险评估评分。

方法

利用英国全国 DCD 数据库,对 2000 年至 2015 年间英国接受 DCD 肝移植的成人受者(n=1153)进行风险分析。根据回归分析计算出新的风险评分(英国 DCD 风险评分)。使用联合器官共享网络数据库(n=1617)和我们自己的 DCD 肝移植数据库(n=315)对其进行验证。最后,将新评分与其他两种可用的预测系统进行比较:加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校和伦敦国王学院医院的 DCD 风险评分。

结果

确定了 7 个对 DCD 移植物存活最强的预测因素:供体热缺血功能、冷缺血、受体终末期肝病模型、受体年龄、供体年龄、既往原位肝移植和供体体重指数。这些危险因素的组合(英国 DCD 风险模型)在整个英国 DCD 数据库、联合器官共享网络和我们自己的 DCD 人群中对最佳受者的移植物存活进行了最佳分层。重要的是,英国 DCD 风险评分显著预测了无功能或缺血性胆管炎导致的无效移植组(>10 分)的移植物丢失。新的预测模型显示出更高的 C 统计量 0.79,优于其他两种可用系统(分别为 0.71 和 0.64)。

结论

英国 DCD 风险评分是一种可靠的工具,可用于检测 DCD 肝移植中供体和受者因素的高危和无效组合。它使用简单,为拒绝哪些 DCD 移植物或可能受益于功能评估和进一步优化提供了更大的潜力。

通俗总结

在这项研究中,我们提供了一种新的用于预测 DCD 肝移植中移植物丢失的预测模型。基于英国的全国数据,新的英国 DCD 风险评分涉及以下七个临床相关的风险因素:供体年龄、供体体重指数、供体热缺血功能、冷储存、受体年龄、受体终末期肝病模型和再次移植。定义了三个风险等级:低风险(0-5 分)、高风险(6-10 分)和无效(>10 分)。与其他可用模型相比,该新模型在移植物存活率方面的分层最佳。无效组合(>10 分)的 1 年和 5 年移植物存活率仅分别为 37%和低于 20%。相比之下,低风险组合(≤5 分)的移植物存活率非常好。新模型在接受肝移植时易于计算。它可能有助于确定哪种风险组合将受益于额外的移植物治疗,或者哪个 DCD 肝应该因特定受者而被拒绝。

相似文献

1
The UK DCD Risk Score: A new proposal to define futility in donation-after-circulatory-death liver transplantation.英国 DCD 风险评分:一种定义脑死亡后捐献肝脏移植中无效性的新提案。
J Hepatol. 2018 Mar;68(3):456-464. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.10.034. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
2
Outcomes of DCD liver transplantation using organs treated by hypothermic oxygenated perfusion before implantation.运用低温氧合灌注处理供肝后进行 DCD 肝移植的效果。
J Hepatol. 2019 Jan;70(1):50-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.10.005. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
3
Outcomes of Donation After Circulatory Death Liver Grafts From Donors 50 Years or Older: A Multicenter Analysis.50 岁及以上供者循环死亡器官捐献肝脏移植的结局:一项多中心分析。
Transplantation. 2018 Jul;102(7):1108-1114. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002120.
4
Attitudes and barriers to the use of donation after cardiac death livers: Comparison of a United States transplant center survey to the united network for organ sharing data.心死亡器官捐献肝脏使用的态度和障碍:美国移植中心调查与联合器官共享网络数据的比较。
Liver Transpl. 2017 Nov;23(11):1372-1383. doi: 10.1002/lt.24855.
5
Longterm results of liver transplantation from donation after circulatory death.循环死亡后器官捐献肝脏移植的长期结果
Liver Transpl. 2016 Aug;22(8):1107-14. doi: 10.1002/lt.24449.
6
A Bayesian methodology to improve prediction of early graft loss after liver transplantation derived from the liver match study.一种源自肝脏匹配研究的用于改善肝移植后早期移植物丢失预测的贝叶斯方法。
Dig Liver Dis. 2014 Apr;46(4):340-7. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2013.11.004. Epub 2014 Jan 9.
7
Clinical outcomes of donation after circulatory death liver transplantation in primary sclerosing cholangitis.原发性硬化性胆管炎患者接受死后循环死亡供肝肝移植的临床结局。
J Hepatol. 2017 Nov;67(5):957-965. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.06.027. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
8
A multicentre outcome analysis to define global benchmarks for donation after circulatory death liver transplantation.多中心结局分析,定义循环死亡器官捐献肝移植的全球基准。
J Hepatol. 2022 Feb;76(2):371-382. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.10.004. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
9
Can hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) rescue futile DCD liver grafts?低温氧合灌注(HOPE)能否挽救无效的 DCD 供肝?
HPB (Oxford). 2019 Sep;21(9):1156-1165. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.01.004. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
10
Retrieval Practice or Overall Donor and Recipient Risk: What Impacts on Outcomes After Donation After Circulatory Death Liver Transplantation in the United Kingdom?检索练习或整体供者和受者风险:对英国体外循环死亡肝脏移植后供肝捐献者和受者结局有何影响?
Liver Transpl. 2019 Apr;25(4):545-558. doi: 10.1002/lt.25410.

引用本文的文献

1
Upper limit of normothermic machine preservation of liver grafts from donation after circulatory death yet to be defined.循环死亡后供体肝脏移植物常温机器保存的上限尚待确定。
World J Transplant. 2025 Jun 18;15(2):99170. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v15.i2.99170.
2
Elderly Ages in Liver Transplantation: Are Older Donors Really Higher Risk?肝移植中的老年受者:老年供者风险真的更高吗?
Transplant Direct. 2025 Apr 9;11(5):e1789. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001789. eCollection 2025 May.
3
Thoracoabdominal Normothermic Regional Perfusion: Real-world Experience and Outcomes of DCD Liver Transplantation.
胸腹常温区域灌注:DCD肝移植的真实世界经验与结果
Transplant Direct. 2025 Feb 28;11(3):e1767. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001767. eCollection 2025 Mar.
4
Challenges and opportunities in organ donation after circulatory death.循环性死亡后器官捐献的挑战与机遇
J Intern Med. 2025 Feb;297(2):124-140. doi: 10.1111/joim.20051. Epub 2025 Jan 20.
5
Machine Learning Algorithms in Controlled Donation After Circulatory Death Under Normothermic Regional Perfusion: A Graft Survival Prediction Model.常温区域灌注下心脏死亡后器官捐献中的机器学习算法:移植器官存活预测模型
Transplantation. 2025 Jul 1;109(7):e362-e370. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000005312. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
6
Risk scores for allograft failure: Are they still useful in liver recipients from donation after circulatory death?同种异体移植失败的风险评分:它们在循环死亡后捐赠的肝移植受者中仍然有用吗?
World J Transplant. 2024 Dec 18;14(4):97612. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v14.i4.97612.
7
The Dallas Donation after Circulatory Death Transplantation Summit: expanding donation after circulatory death procedures through process improvement, broader utilization, and innovation.达拉斯循环性死亡后器官捐献移植峰会:通过流程改进、更广泛利用和创新来扩大循环性死亡后器官捐献程序。
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2024 Oct 1;13(5):824-836. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-23-503. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
8
The Association Between the Origin of the Donation After Circulatory Death Liver Recovery Team and Graft Survival: A National Study.循环死亡后肝脏获取团队的来源与移植物存活之间的关联:一项全国性研究。
Transplant Direct. 2024 Sep 17;10(10):e1699. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001699. eCollection 2024 Oct.
9
Liver function maximum capacity test during normothermic regional perfusion predicts graft function after transplantation.常温区域灌注期间的肝功能最大容量测试可预测移植后的移植物功能。
EPMA J. 2024 Jul 16;15(3):545-558. doi: 10.1007/s13167-024-00371-7. eCollection 2024 Sep.
10
Standardization is needed in reporting risk and outcomes of machine perfusion in liver transplantation.肝移植中机器灌注的风险和结果报告需要标准化。
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2024 Aug 1;13(4):709-714. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-24-301. Epub 2024 Jul 18.