Suppr超能文献

乳腺癌患者的全身与乳腺同时 18F-FDG PET/MRI 检查:表观扩散系数与最大标准化摄取值的比较

Simultaneous whole-body and breast 18F-FDG PET/MRI examinations in patients with breast cancer: a comparison of apparent diffusion coefficients and maximum standardized uptake values.

作者信息

Sasaki Michiro, Tozaki Mitsuhiro, Kubota Kazunori, Murakami Wakana, Yotsumoto Daisuke, Sagara Yasuaki, Ohi Yasuyo, Oosako Shunichi, Sagara Yoshiaki

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Sagara Perth Avenue Clinic, 26-13 Shinyashiki-cho, Kagoshima, Kagoshima, 892-0838, Japan.

Department of Radiology, Sagara Hospital Affiliated Breast Center, 3-28 Tenokuchi-cho, Kagoshima, Kagoshima, 892-0845, Japan.

出版信息

Jpn J Radiol. 2018 Feb;36(2):122-133. doi: 10.1007/s11604-017-0707-y. Epub 2017 Nov 20.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare standardized uptake value (SUV) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values acquired using a PET/MRI scanner in breast cancer patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Whole-body PET/MRI and breast PET/MRI were performed in 108 consecutive patients. Ninety-four patients who had a total of 100 breast cancers were analyzed. SUVmax and ADCmean acquired using breast PET/MRI were compared with pathologic prognostic factors.

RESULTS

All the lesions were visually detectable using PET and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) on breast PET/MRI; however, lesions were visually undetectable on whole-body DWI in 13 patients (13%) or on whole-body PET in 7 patients (7%). An analysis of ADCmean and SUVmax demonstrated a statistically significant correlation between whole-body imaging and breast imaging (rho = 0.613, p < 0.001 and rho = 0.928, p < 0.001, respectively). In a univariate analysis, SUVmax was significantly correlated with HER2 status (p < 0.001), Ki-67 (p = 0.014), tumor size (p = 0.0177), and nuclear grade (p = 0.0448). In multiple regression analysis, only tumor size (p = 0.00701) was shown to independently influence SUVmax.

CONCLUSION

Prone breast imaging was more sensitive than whole-body PET/MRI for detection of breast cancers. Both SUVmax and ADCmean showed limited correlation with pathologic prognostic factors.

摘要

目的

比较使用PET/MRI扫描仪获取的乳腺癌患者的标准化摄取值(SUV)和表观扩散系数(ADC)值。

材料与方法

对108例连续患者进行了全身PET/MRI和乳腺PET/MRI检查。对94例共有100个乳腺癌的患者进行了分析。将使用乳腺PET/MRI获取的SUVmax和ADCmean与病理预后因素进行比较。

结果

所有病变在乳腺PET/MRI上通过PET和扩散加权成像(DWI)均可视觉检测到;然而,13例患者(13%)的病变在全身DWI上或7例患者(7%)的病变在全身PET上视觉不可检测到。对ADCmean和SUVmax的分析表明,全身成像与乳腺成像之间存在统计学显著相关性(分别为rho = 0.613,p < 0.001和rho = 0.928,p < 0.001)。在单变量分析中,SUVmax与HER2状态(p < 0.001)、Ki-67(p = 0.014)、肿瘤大小(p = 0.0177)和核分级(p = 0.0448)显著相关。在多元回归分析中,仅肿瘤大小(p = 0.00701)被证明独立影响SUVmax。

结论

俯卧位乳腺成像在检测乳腺癌方面比全身PET/MRI更敏感。SUVmax和ADCmean与病理预后因素的相关性均有限。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验