a Division of Public Health Sciences , Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center , Seattle , Washington , USA.
b Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (formerly Group Health Research Institute) , Seattle , Washington , USA.
Subst Use Misuse. 2018 May 12;53(6):980-988. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2017.1387569. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
Prior studies have suggested that, among the domains of depressive symptoms, low positive affect (PA) may have a distinct relationship with smoking cessation and relapse. However, the empirical basis for PA-focused interventions cessation is limited, with some mixed findings.
Using a large, diverse sample of treatment-seeking smokers, this study tested the hypothesis that PA adds unique predictive value beyond the effects of the other symptom domains in models of cessation and relapse.
Adult smokers participating in a smoking cessation trial (n = 450) were included in this post hoc analysis. Cessation outcomes included smoking abstinence at end of treatment and at 6-month follow-up. Relapse was defined as recurrence of smoking at 6-month follow-up among the end-of-treatment abstainers. Depressive symptoms were assessed at baseline using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression (CES-D) scale.
With the exception of PA, all of the CES-D domains predicted reduced likelihood of smoking abstinence at end of treatment and cotinine-confirmed (but not self-reported) abstinence at 6 months, as did total CES-D score (all p-values < .05). None of the symptom domains predicted relapse. Conclusions/Importance: Our results provide further evidence that current depressive symptoms predict worse cessation outcomes, but they fail to support recent work suggesting that low PA has incremental predictive value for cessation or relapse beyond the other depressive symptom domains. To improve quit rates for smokers with depressive symptoms, evidence-based mood management interventions should be included in treatment planning.
先前的研究表明,在抑郁症状的各个领域中,低积极情绪(PA)可能与戒烟和复吸有明显的关系。然而,以 PA 为重点的干预措施在戒烟方面的实证基础有限,存在一些相互矛盾的发现。
本研究使用大量不同的寻求治疗的吸烟者样本,检验了 PA 在戒烟和复吸模型中除了其他症状领域的影响之外,是否具有独特的预测价值的假设。
本事后分析纳入了参加戒烟试验的成年吸烟者(n=450)。戒烟结局包括治疗结束时和 6 个月随访时的吸烟 abstinence。复吸定义为治疗结束时 abstainers 在 6 个月随访时再次吸烟。抑郁症状在基线时使用流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)进行评估。
除了 PA,CES-D 量表的所有领域都预测了治疗结束时吸烟 abstinence 的可能性降低,以及 6 个月时经可替宁确认(但不是自我报告)的 abstinence,总 CES-D 评分也是如此(所有 p 值均<0.05)。没有一个症状领域预测了复吸。结论/重要性:我们的结果进一步证明了当前的抑郁症状预测戒烟结局较差,但未能支持最近的工作,即低 PA 对戒烟或复吸的预测价值超过其他抑郁症状领域。为了提高有抑郁症状的吸烟者的戒烟率,应在治疗计划中纳入基于证据的情绪管理干预措施。