Eisenberg M S, Moore J, Cummins R O, Andresen E, Litwin P E, Hallstrom A P, Hearne T
Center for Evaluation of Emergency Medical Service, Seattle, Washington 98104.
Am J Cardiol. 1989 Feb 15;63(7):443-6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(89)90316-0.
This 57-month study evaluated the use of automatic external defibrillators (AEDs) in the homes of high risk cardiac patients (survivors of out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation [VF]). The goal was to determine the utility of these devices by trained lay persons in actual cardiac arrest episodes. Ninety-seven survivors of out-of-hospital VF were enrolled in the study; 59 patients received AEDs, and 38 patients served as a control group. During the study period, 7 deaths occurred in the hospital without preceding out-of-hospital cardiac arrest or from noncardiac causes. There were 14 out-of-hospital cardiac arrests, 10 in the AED group and 4 in the control group. There was 1 long-term survivor in the control group. In the AED group, among the 10 cardiac arrests for which the device was available, it was used in 6. Only 2 patients were in VF; 1 was resuscitated with residual neurologic deficits and survived several months. This study observed a small potential for AEDs to save high risk patients.
这项为期57个月的研究评估了高危心脏病患者(院外心室颤动[VF]幸存者)家中自动体外除颤器(AED)的使用情况。目的是确定这些设备在实际心脏骤停事件中由经过培训的非专业人员使用的效用。97名院外VF幸存者参与了该研究;59名患者接受了AED,38名患者作为对照组。在研究期间,7例患者在医院死亡,并非院外心脏骤停或由非心脏原因导致。发生了14次院外心脏骤停,AED组10次,对照组4次。对照组有1名长期幸存者。在AED组,在设备可用的10次心脏骤停中,6次使用了AED。只有2例患者为VF;1例复苏成功,但有残留神经功能缺损,存活了几个月。本研究观察到AED挽救高危患者的可能性较小。