Rodriguez-Merchan E Carlos
a Department of Orthopaedic Surgery , La Paz University Hospital-IdiPaz , Madrid , Spain.
Hosp Pract (1995). 2018 Feb;46(1):1-4. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2018.1410425. Epub 2017 Nov 30.
Intra-articular (IA) corticosteroid (CS) injections are commonly used in the treatment of osteoarthritis. However, they are rarely utilized in haemophilic arthropathy. In fact, the efficacy of this method in haemophilic arthropathy is frequently discussed and debated in clinical practice.
To investigate the effectiveness of IA CS injections in patients with painful haemophilic arthropathy.
A review of the literature on the topic was performed.
In osteoarthritis, reports with a high level of evidence state that the efficacy of IA injections of CS is controversial. In haemophilic arthropathy, some low-level evidence reports seem to indicate that short-term pain alleviation can be achieved.
Considering that pain relief after IA injections of CS is controversial and that the cost of the haematologic treatment required to perform the procedure is high in haemophilic arthropathy, we do not recommend the routine use of CS IS injections in haemophilia. Moreover, point of care (POC) ultrasound (US)-guided injections are not advised, because the injection procedure is so simple that the use of POC-US will unnecessarily prolong the duration of the procedure.
关节内(IA)注射皮质类固醇(CS)常用于骨关节炎的治疗。然而,它们在血友病性关节病中很少使用。事实上,这种方法在血友病性关节病中的疗效在临床实践中经常被讨论和争论。
研究IA注射CS对疼痛性血友病性关节病患者的有效性。
对该主题的文献进行了综述。
在骨关节炎中,有高水平证据的报告表明IA注射CS的疗效存在争议。在血友病性关节病中,一些低水平证据的报告似乎表明可以实现短期疼痛缓解。
考虑到IA注射CS后的疼痛缓解存在争议,且在血友病性关节病中进行该操作所需的血液学治疗成本很高,我们不建议在血友病中常规使用CS关节内注射。此外,不建议使用即时护理(POC)超声(US)引导注射,因为注射过程非常简单以至于使用POC-US会不必要地延长操作时间。