Department of Dermatology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center and Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Department of Ophthalmology, Mid Atlantic Retina Specialists, Hagerstown, Maryland, USA.
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Jul;46(5):502-510. doi: 10.1111/ceo.13129. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
Primary bilateral uveal melanoma (UM) is a rare and incompletely described entity. It is not known how these patients compare to those with unilateral UM.
We sought to comprehensively characterize and compare patients with primary bilateral and unilateral UM.
Retrospective, population-based and systematic review.
Patients with bilateral (n = 52) and unilateral UM (n = 8915).
We analysed cases of primary bilateral UM from three data sources: (i) the University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center pathology database from 1996 to 2016 (n = 1); (ii) the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End-Results (SEER)-18 database from 1973 to 2013 (n = 5) and (iii) a systematic review of the English language literature (n = 46). Cases of unilateral UM were obtained from the SEER-18 database from 1973 to 2013 for comparison (n = 8915).
Demographics, clinicopathological characteristics, treatments and survival.
There were no differences in sex, race, mean age at diagnosis, site of uveal involvement, metastases at diagnosis, or treatment among patients with bilateral as compared to unilateral UM. Additionally, there were no clinicopathological differences between the two UMs in each patient with bilateral disease. Overall survival did not differ between unilateral and bilateral UM patients, or between bilateral UM patients who presented with, or subsequently developed, bilateral disease.
Bilateral and unilateral UM patients share similar demographics, clinicopathological characteristics, treatments and prognoses. Moreover, the development of bilateral disease does not portend a poorer prognosis and patients should be treated similarly to those with unilateral disease.
原发性双侧葡萄膜黑素瘤(UM)是一种罕见且描述不完整的实体。目前尚不清楚这些患者与单侧 UM 患者相比如何。
我们试图全面描述和比较原发性双侧和单侧 UM 患者。
回顾性、基于人群和系统评价。
双侧(n=52)和单侧 UM(n=8915)患者。
我们从三个数据源分析了原发性双侧 UM 的病例:(i)1996 年至 2016 年克利夫兰大学医院病理学数据库(n=1);(ii)1973 年至 2013 年监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)-18 数据库(n=5);(iii)英文文献的系统评价(n=46)。为了比较,从 SEER-18 数据库获得了单侧 UM 的病例(n=8915)。
人口统计学、临床病理学特征、治疗和生存。
双侧 UM 患者与单侧 UM 患者在性别、种族、诊断时的平均年龄、葡萄膜受累部位、诊断时的转移、或治疗方面无差异。此外,在患有双侧疾病的每位患者中,两种 UM 之间在临床病理学方面也没有差异。单侧和双侧 UM 患者的总体生存率无差异,也没有双侧 UM 患者的预后差异,这些患者是首发双侧疾病还是随后发展为双侧疾病。
双侧和单侧 UM 患者具有相似的人口统计学、临床病理学特征、治疗和预后。此外,双侧疾病的发展并不预示着预后更差,患者应与单侧疾病患者相似的治疗方式。